May 2015 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 911517] Midnight Commander - error messages in case of SFTP file transfers
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '15

04 May '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911517 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chcao(a)suse.com Assignee|bnc-team-screening(a)forge.pr |nadvornik(a)suse.com |ovo.novell.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 836558] MidnightCommander: long file-names in tar archives truncated
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '15

04 May '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836558 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chcao(a)suse.com Assignee|bnc-team-screening(a)forge.pr |nadvornik(a)suse.com |ovo.novell.com | --- Comment #7 from Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> --- Hi Vladimir, would you please help to have a look at this issue? If it is fixed, would you please help to close it? Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 802624] Switching from nvidia-gfxG03 to nvidia-gfxG04 results in no nvidia kernel module being available
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '15

04 May '15

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802624 --- Comment #43 from Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer(a)tmo.at> --- (In reply to Wolfgang Bauer from comment #42) > (In reply to Egbert Eich from comment #41) > > Can you edit the wiki page yourself? > > Can I? > No idea, haven't tried yet. Well, yes I can and just added a warning regarding this. Please review, and change accordingly if you think it should be done in a different way. My second question still stands though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 929506] New: Policy Kit opens the authorization dialogue window in the wrong account
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '15

04 May '15

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=929506 Bug ID: 929506 Summary: Policy Kit opens the authorization dialogue window in the wrong account Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: 13.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE 13.2 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE4 Workspace Assignee: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: stakanov(a)freenet.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Policy Kit opens the authorization dialogue not in the active user but in "one of the open sessions" waiting for root password to mount an usb-key. Standard installation of opensuse 13.2 Create several users e.g. A, B, C, D Open these users in sequence. Change e.g. from user B, to C, To A and finally to D. Insert an usb-key while user D is active and open and the other sessions are in background. The authorization request for the root password will open in the wrong user-personality. Only going there, then closing there the request, going back to the user D in question, will make you find the correct authorization window. There does not seem to be a pattern to foresee where the authorization request will pop up. What happens: user waits for the authorization window to occur but it opens in a wrong personality. What should happen: the authorization request should be presented to the user who did actually insert the usb-key. Reproducible: stable, always. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 802624] Switching from nvidia-gfxG03 to nvidia-gfxG04 results in no nvidia kernel module being available
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '15

04 May '15

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802624 Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer(a)tmo.at> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(wbauer(a)tmo.at) |needinfo?(eich(a)suse.com) --- Comment #42 from Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer(a)tmo.at> --- (In reply to Egbert Eich from comment #41) > Can you edit the wiki page yourself? Can I? No idea, haven't tried yet. Still, it would need a new ymp file as well, which I don't know how to supply. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 713581] bogus logrotate config for apache2
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '15

04 May '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713581 --- Comment #3 from Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Bruno Friedmann from comment #2) > Petr, I'm personally already using a similar things on my deployed openSUSE Why you haven't send a sr :)? > /var/log/apache2/access_log /var/log/apache2/error_log > /var/log/apache2/suexec.log /var/log/apache2/deflate.log > /var/log/apache2/ssl_request_log /var/log/apache2/ssl_engine_log { > compress > dateext > maxage 365 > rotate 99 > size=+1024k > notifempty > missingok > create 644 root root > postrotate > systemctl reload apache2.service > endscript > } This is missing 'sharedscripts' which should resolve the original report if I understand correctly. > or and *.log when tuned ... > > Take care, we don't have httpd.service :-) Oops, sure :-]. > And I'm not sure why they want to push everything to dev/null ? > if it failed it's better to have the cron logrotate job sending an email. Ok. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 802624] Switching from nvidia-gfxG03 to nvidia-gfxG04 results in no nvidia kernel module being available
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '15

04 May '15

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802624 Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eich(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(wbauer(a)tmo.at) --- Comment #41 from Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Wolfgang Bauer from comment #40) > Maybe just declare the switch as unsupported finally, and mention on the > Wiki page that one should deinstall the driver first before switching to a > different version? (then this whole bug report could be closed as WONTFIX I > suppose) > > The Wiki page still doesn't even mention G04 yet, btw, nor offers an 1-click > install... > Should I file another bug report about this? Or how is this handled? Can you edit the wiki page yourself? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 929189] Parted 3.2 breaks yast workflows
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '15

04 May '15

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929189 Petr Uzel <puzel(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P2 - High -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 915037] scp bash completion removes servername on completion
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '15

04 May '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915037 Adrian Schröter <adrian(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(werner(a)suse.com) --- Comment #28 from Adrian Schröter <adrian(a)suse.com> --- @Werner, my understanding was that this fix is in git already? Since the last change is from 2013 in that file it would be out already. About which change/fix do we speak exactly here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 802624] Switching from nvidia-gfxG03 to nvidia-gfxG04 results in no nvidia kernel module being available
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '15

04 May '15

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802624 --- Comment #40 from Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer(a)tmo.at> --- (In reply to Stefan Dirsch from comment #39) > Thanks. Updated tags product/version tags and bugrepor description. I probably should have done that myself, I guess... Sorry. > If YaST installs G04 first, then uninstalls G03, the symlinks will be reset > to > X.Org in %postun of G03 package. Not sure how this can be fixed at all. :-( Right. I have no idea either at the moment. Maybe just declare the switch as unsupported finally, and mention on the Wiki page that one should deinstall the driver first before switching to a different version? (then this whole bug report could be closed as WONTFIX I suppose) The Wiki page still doesn't even mention G04 yet, btw, nor offers an 1-click install... Should I file another bug report about this? Or how is this handled? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0