December 2014 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 841822] FOSS AMD video driver gives black screen on resume from Suspend
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=841822 Andrey Karepin <egdfree(a)opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |egdfree(a)opensuse.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 668686] Terribly ugly font rendering on openSUSE 11.4 M6
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668686 Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sb56637(a)gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann(a)suse.com> --- *** Bug 904238 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 904238] New: Missing "fontconfig-infinality" package for 13.2
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904238 Bug ID: 904238 Summary: Missing "fontconfig-infinality" package for 13.2 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: 13.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: sb56637(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hello, This package is missing for 13.2: http://software.opensuse.org/package/fontconfig-infinality Please note that it was available from the official repos in 13.1, at version 20130104, then it disappears entirely in 13.1, and then re-appears at an older version 20120615 in Factory. Kind of strange. Thanks for looking into this! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 668686] Terribly ugly font rendering on openSUSE 11.4 M6
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668686 Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |samjnaa(a)gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa(a)gmail.com> --- LOL this is probably the most hilarious bug reports I ever read (esp the steps to reproduce) but sadly it is totally true. Anyhow, the situation is what it is with the "litigation-based corporate environment in the US" as I read mentioned in some website about openSUSE's absence of out-of-the-box support for lots of things... But I left my distro of 10 years viz Kubuntu to come back to openSUSE for lots of technical reasons -- out-of-the-box is not really an issue for me. Anyhow, I just wanted to add a few relevant links here: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=906040#c1 is the currently cleanest way to get great rendering on openSUSE (running Tumbleweed here). https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904238 explains the legal situation and this bug should probably be merged with that (or the other way around). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 908134] virt-v2v: no virtio kernel found at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.20.1/Sys/VirtConvert/Converter/Linux.pm line 1175.
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908134 --- Comment #8 from Mike Latimer <mlatimer(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Martin Pluskal from comment #4) > Ah, I was using > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/ > Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization/3.0/html-single/V2V_Guide/index.html#sub- > sect-convert-remote-kvm-virtual-machine as source of information, and my > understanding of "Converting a remote KVM virtual machine" was that virt-v2v > can also be used to transef vm between hosts. So that documentation has prompted me to rethink things a bit... It does make sense to convert a KVM guest to RHEV using virt-v2v. As RHEV is KVM-based, KVM to KVM should definitely work. > > Regarding the log in comment #2, the important message here is "The > > connected hypervisor does not support a x86_64 kvm guest". > I am not sure what was source of this error, but both machines are KVM - I > was not trying to convert KVM to XEN. Hmm... The above message is specifically due to `virsh capabilities` not reporting that an x86_64 guest is supported as a KVM domain. However, looking earlier into the debug log I found the following message: > Could not access KVM kernel module: No such file or directory > failed to initialize KVM: No such file or directory Can you attach a supportconfig from the target machine? It looks like we are not even detecting a hypervisor. Another interesting message in that debug log is as follows: > virt-v2v: No capability in config matches os='linux' name='virtio' > distro='opensuse' major='0' minor='0' It looks like openSUSE_Factory is not reporting a valid major and minor number from the guestfs tools. I'll have to dig deeper here. Can you try testing with SLES12, or openSUSE 13.2? (If you do, please attach debug logs.) I just ran a quick KVM-KVM test (SLES12 KVM -to- SLES12 KVM, with a SLES12 guest) and it did work for me. I'll dig through your logs further next week and track down what the root cause is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 893578] open-iscsi: includes mkinitrd scripts
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Dec '14

05 Dec '14

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893578 --- Comment #7 from Lee Duncan <lduncan(a)suse.com> --- Changes submitted to openSUSE:Factory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 901752] tigervnc "view-only" does not work (in opensuse 12.1 it did)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Dec '14

05 Dec '14

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901752 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Schäfer <tschaefer(a)t-online.de> --- I would like to try it, but I can't download the packages you made. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 908430] New: nagios-plugins & nagios-plugins-extra missing for icinga implementation
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Dec '14

05 Dec '14

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908430 Bug ID: 908430 Summary: nagios-plugins & nagios-plugins-extra missing for icinga implementation Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: 13.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE 13.2 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: cuchumino(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0 Build Identifier: >From what I can see there are a couple of other nagios packages that are missing. Not sure if nagios itself was taken out of the repository due to lack of development, but nagios-plugins and nagios-plugins-extra are vital for icinga's proper useage. I am aware of bug https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904559 But this only reports Nagios NPRE packages missing, which I'm assuming isn't the same. I'm opening this bug specifically for nagios-plugins and nagios-plugins-extra given that these packages are vital to icinga. Thanks! Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 908662] New: GCC fails to compile in-class initialization with conversion (C++11)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Dec '14

05 Dec '14

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908662 Bug ID: 908662 Summary: GCC fails to compile in-class initialization with conversion (C++11) Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 13.1 Version: Final Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE 13.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: groszdanireg(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 616163 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=616163&action=edit Compile this. GCC fails to compile code with in-class initialization in a template class which requires conversion. Compile the attachment with g++ --std=c++11 inclass_conversion.ii It compiles with clang. It also compiles if the class is not a template. $ g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-suse-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/lib64 --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,ada --enable-checking=release --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.8 --enable-ssp --disable-libssp --disable-plugin --with-bugurl=http://bugs.opensuse.org/ --with-pkgversion='SUSE Linux' --disable-libgcj --disable-libmudflap --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-linker-build-id --enable-linux-futex --program-suffix=-4.8 --without-system-libunwind --with-arch-32=i586 --with-tune=generic --build=x86_64-suse-linux --host=x86_64-suse-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.3 20140627 [gcc-4_8-branch revision 212064] (SUSE Linux) $ uname -a Linux as.lan 3.11.10-21-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Jul 21 15:28:46 UTC 2014 (9a9565d) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 907966] myspell english language packaging is very inconvenient for Firefox/TB users (maybe others)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Dec '14

05 Dec '14

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907966 Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P4 - Low Status|NEW |CONFIRMED CC| |tchvatal(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> --- I am not sure. The packaging changed -- you are right. That was in order to have package more maintainable as none wanted to maintain it in the shape that had before. Now, each package corresponds to folder in http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/dictionaries/tree/ and the package gets generated from there. I am afraid that the change you propose would put the package back to previous state. I'll look at it in next week, but with (very) low priority. And of course, patches are welcome. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0