October 2011 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 659835] New: Switching to the Installed System Failed
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659835 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659835#c0 Summary: Switching to the Installed System Failed Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: VMWare OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: kraisornardhan(a)aim.com QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 Switching to the installed system has failed. Checking for binary /mnt/bin/ls...Failed Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Download OpenSUSE 11.3 2.Install OpenSUSE 11.3 in VMWare Player with Brigde network configuration 3.Skip or Ignore every online installing components Actual Results: Switching to the Installed System Failed Expected Results: Can run OpenSUSE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 721302] New: gcc: Programing join-lists with C produces data garbage
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721302 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721302#c0 Summary: gcc: Programing join-lists with C produces data garbage Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development AssignedTo: pth(a)suse.com ReportedBy: esddss(a)t-online.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110907 SUSE/3.6.22-0.2.1 Firefox/3.6.22 gcc: Programing join-lists with C produces data garbage I programed a join list (according to a C-learningbook) with C by Anjuta IDE with following structures as terminal program: struct knoten { char str[255]; struct knoten *next; struct knoten *previous; }; typedef struct knoten Knoten_t; typedef struct knoten* KnotenPtr_t; KnotenPtr_t anfang = NULL,ende = NULL; The inputs and listings of the data are successfull and works without problems. Here the correct terminal output of 'struct knoten' with forward (knoten->next) and backward output (knoten->previous): Michael // forward Anne Ina Peter Maxi Maxi // backward Peter Ina Anne Michael ! Deleted data 'Ina' and then listed with forward (knoten->next) and backward output (knoten->previous): Michael // forward Anne Peter Maxi Maxi // backward Peter ؎�� // here are data garbage Anne Michael The terminal program shows the data garbage without problems, the performing with GUI variant (Gnome) creates at this place a crash. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.I programed a join list (according to a C-learningbook) with C by Anjuta IDE with following structures as terminal program. 2.The inputs and listings of the data are successfull. 3.Deleted data 'Ina' and then listed with forward (knoten->next) and backward output (knoten->previous) . Actual Results: Get data garbage after deleting data by backward listing. Expected Results: No data garbage by backward listing! Programed a join list (according to a C-learningbook) with C and gcc-compiler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 710269] Install/Update from nfs source (and probably others like smb) fails for factory (since 11.4)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710269 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710269#c12 --- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj(a)urpla.net> 2011-10-04 10:34:43 UTC --- Ping Michael, I can imagine, that you're very busy with other issues, but a short response like: "wait a little", "will not fix for 12.1", "will remove any nfs and smb install source targets from libzypp and yast soon" or "cannot see any issue here" would be really appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 721877] New: devel:languages:python/python-repoze-what: Bug
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721877 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721877#c0 Summary: devel:languages:python/python-repoze-what: Bug Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: 3rd party software AssignedTo: cfarrell(a)suse.com ReportedBy: serg666_2000(a)mail.ru QAContact: opensuse-communityscreening(a)forge.provo.novell.com CC: jmatejek(a)suse.com, speilicke(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- there is no package with name python-repoze-what in devel:languages:python repository. Can you build the package according to http://forums.opensuse.org/p-russian/dhydh-dh-dh-dhun-dh-dh-dh/1054-1073-10… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 719034] New: first boot of install, black screen, hung, AFAIK, NOT infinite loop issue, empty /var/log/messages, klogd missing but nodeps, HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719034 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719034#c0 Summary: first boot of install, black screen, hung, AFAIK, NOT infinite loop issue, empty /var/log/messages, klogd missing but nodeps, HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Milestone 5 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: SuSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: Pemberton.John.M(a)gmail.com QAContact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created an attachment (id=451801) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=451801) bzip2'd contents recursive tar of /var/log and hwinfo.txt file, output of hwinfo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/6.0 Downloaded the ISO described by the following output, at the illustrated time. # file /mnt2/toes/openSUSE-DVD-Build0250-x86_64.iso/openSUSE-DVD-Build0250-x86_64.iso /mnt2/toes/openSUSE-DVD-Build0250-x86_64.iso/openSUSE-DVD-Build0250-x86_64.iso: # ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data 'openSUSE-DVD-x86_640250 ' (bootable) # ll /mnt2/toes/openSUSE-DVD-Build0250-x86_64.iso/openSUSE-DVD-Build0250-x86_64.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 1000 users 4534042624 Sep 17 02:50 /mnt2/toes/openSUSE-DVD-Build0250-x86_64.iso/openSUSE-DVD-Build0250-x86_64.iso MD5 sum matched, burned DVD, verified burn. Went through first "phase" of install, selected KDE. Install procedure tried to reboot the system; attempt hung with underscore in upper left corner of black screen. KBD shortcuts to restart X server, or reboot machine, would not work. Cold rebooted from install DVD; forced update, hoping during the process, the install might complete. Install procedure tried to install 1 RPM. This time reboot got to lizard in middle of green "corduroy" background, hung about midway through progress bar. Tried same thing again hoping things might get further, but similar result, install still ried to install 1 RPM. I can boot the system in fail safe mode which appears to fallback to he nouveau driver. In boot.msg I see: HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed for '/dev/sdd' which is the root drive, even though the corresponding drive is specified by-id in GRUB's menu.lst, and somehow facilities during boot time can fsck the drive successfully using the designation /dev/sdd as base name for drive partitions, rather by-id. /var/log/messages is empty, in boot.msg there are messages such as: /sbin/klogd is not installed some of the start up scripts appear to be trying to run klogd, yet both yast and the rpm command, seem to indicate that nothing depends on the klogd package. The klogd package is not installed. How can there be scripts installed, trying to run klogd, but those things do not show dependencies on klogd? If a script tries to run klogd, doesn't that script depend on klogd? Is this something that got lost in the weeds on the way to systemd? Unless there's something worth investigating, some reason to leave the system in its current condition, I'll probably install klogd manually and see where that gets me. Especially since there were some repeated messages that looked like complaints. They flew by so fast I couldn't quite catch them. With the broken logging situation, it seems they weren't caught in a file. AFAIC, debugging should be done in the simplest context possible, to minimize the number of variables that can affect things. I almost care how sophisticate technology gets, I want a gosh RS232 port so I can use have a serial console in a simple way. But Hewlett Packard, in their "infinite wisdom" :-O decided this machine should have no RS232 serial port, so no serial console. Unless the serial console mechanism has evolved enough so someone can show me how to directed it to a virtual RS232 port over USB, using one of those modules, something over USB, or some kludge, I may be stuck with log files, unless I can catch the messages with a video camera as they fly by. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Do the install as I've suggested above, on identical hardware. 2. After the first attempt at causing install to go further, by forcing update rather than new install, every time it boots in standard, non- failsafe mode, it seems to behave as described, every time. 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 425059] [yast2-hardware-detection] Autoyast is unable to use predefined system attributes (.probe.bios)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425059 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425059#c11 Martin Vidner <mvidner(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Martin Vidner <mvidner(a)suse.com> 2011-10-04 11:20:53 CEST --- OK, leaving it for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 721846] New: yast2-core: buildfix for ARM
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721846 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721846#c0 Summary: yast2-core: buildfix for ARM Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 AssignedTo: mvidner(a)suse.com ReportedBy: dmueller(a)suse.com QAContact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: Development Blocker: --- Hi, please apply this patch for yast2-core and submit it to openSUSE:Factory: --- debugger/Debugger.cc +++ debugger/Debugger.cc @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ #include <sys/un.h> #include <netinet/in.h> #include <stdio.h> +#include <errno.h> #define ADDRESS "/tmp/yast.socket" #define PORT 16384 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 721727] New: missing dependency in kdebase4-workspace: libfam0
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721727 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721727#c0 Summary: missing dependency in kdebase4-workspace: libfam0 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: X.Org AssignedTo: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de ReportedBy: mvyskocil(a)suse.com QAContact: xorg-maintainer-bugs(a)forge.provo.novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- The kdebase4-workspace needs to have libfam0 in requires, because without it kdm and kstartupconfi4 (at least don't work). Kdm fails with Oct 3 10:35:10 zelva kdm_config[3585]: Multiple occurrences of section [X-:*-Core] in /usr/share/kde4/config/kdm/kdmrc. Consider merging them. Oct 3 10:35:10 zelva kdm_config[3585]: Multiple occurrences of section [X-:0-Core] in /usr/share/kde4/config/kdm/kdmrc. Consider merging them. Oct 3 10:35:11 zelva kdm: :0[3595]: Received unknown or unexpected command -2 from greeter Oct 3 10:35:11 zelva kdm: :0[3595]: Abnormal termination of greeter for display :0, code 127, signal 0 And $ kstartupconfig4 kdostartupconfig4: error while loading shared libraries: libfam.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory After installation of libfam0 both kdm and startkde works well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 712082] New: Parted silently ignores a given partition start
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712082 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712082#c0 Summary: Parted silently ignores a given partition start Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: puzel(a)novell.com ReportedBy: pth(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de CC: coolo(a)novell.com Found By: Development Blocker: --- I had accidently removed an entry in a partition table that was the main pv for my lvm setup. The partition started at 8801MB but when recreating the partition table entry parted ignored that and used 8802MB instead. When I passed him 8800MB which overlapped with the previous partition parted offered 8801MB as the next possible start and after accepting that warned that that woudn't be optimally aligned which you can then ignore. This behaviour is unacceptable as parted must ask whether you want to take the performance hit and only use the next optimal start if you tell it to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 402545] Making pin easier to read on CLI if no package is installed
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402545 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402545#c13 Michal Vyskocil <mvyskocil(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P3 - Medium Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |houghi(a)houghi.org --- Comment #13 from Michal Vyskocil <mvyskocil(a)suse.com> 2011-10-04 07:38:52 UTC --- Uhm, I am not sure if I want to change the output of the old beast like pin is. However it might make a sense add your script as an alternative - what would be the name for it? I am not sure about pin, so maybe epin, zpin, zin, ... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0