October 2011 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 629374] New: desktop-data-openSUSE contains some KDE-specific bits
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 25 Nov '18

25 Nov '18

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629374 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629374#c0 Summary: desktop-data-openSUSE contains some KDE-specific bits Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.4 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE4 Workspace AssignedTo: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de ReportedBy: vuntz(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Here are some bits in desktop-data-openSUSE that should probably live in some of the kde branding packages (or in qt): + etc/kde4/: contains kdm/backgroundrc (should live in kdm-branding-openSUSE) + etc/profile.d/desktop-data.* and usr/share/desktop-data: the scripts have a line to set QT_SYSTEM_DIR to /usr/share/desktop-data. This should really live in a qt package. I'm also wondering about everything in etc/xdg/menus/, usr/share/desktop-directories/ and usr/share/icons/: this contains the XDG menu structure, except that GNOME now uses something else since we were not happy with this structure and were unable to make any real progress on changing it. LXDE also doesn't use it. So it's now more or less KDE-specific... Finally, etc/skel/ contains public_html. Is this something you want to keep? I know it annoys me to have this directory created. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 700065] New: the wiki produces invalid XHTML
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 27 May '18

27 May '18

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700065 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700065#c0 Summary: the wiki produces invalid XHTML Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.4 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Wiki AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: giecrilj(a)stegny.2a.pl QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1 The wiki pages are declared to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional. A script inserted into every HEAD violates this declaration. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Validate <URL: http://en.opensuse.org/Main_Page >. 2. Inspect the document source. Actual Results: 1. Line 21, Column 16: required attribute "type" not specified 2. <script> Expected Results: 1. No errors 2. <script type="text/javascript" > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 682920] New: strange defaults in mailman
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 May '18

15 May '18

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682920 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682920#c0 Summary: strange defaults in mailman Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: jmatejek(a)novell.com ReportedBy: suse-beta(a)cboltz.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Beta-Customer Blocker: --- (partly copied from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2007-November/058954.html after seeing the same problem on 11.3) I called "/usr/lib/mailman/bin/newlist mailman" to create the master mailing list. Doing so resulted in the error Bad owner email address: mailman@(unused) The openSUSE Mailman package sets DEFAULT_URL_HOST and DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST to '(unused)' in Defaults.py, which causes this problem. Please use a default without parenthesis - according to the mail I linked above, this should display the "correct" error message about an invalid list address. Of course it would be even better to have an error message that says DEFAULT_URL_HOST and DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST need to be set - but that's probably something for upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 640407] New: SDL: erroneously uses xrandr-style mode switching
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Feb '18

09 Feb '18

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640407 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640407#c0 Summary: SDL: erroneously uses xrandr-style mode switching Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: X.Org AssignedTo: bnc-team-xorg-bugs(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: jengelh(a)medozas.de QAContact: xorg-maintainer-bugs(a)forge.provo.novell.com Found By: Beta-Customer Blocker: --- Starting with 11.3, I am seeing a new issue with my "oversize" desktop (2944x2208 VirtualSize on a 1280x1024 resolution). Problem: SDL-1.2.14. When SDL switches to fullscreen 640x480 - for example, because the game is configured to run in such resolution - or back, it changes the desktop size too by means of xrandr or something along the lines of that. Actual results: Windows on my desktop are reordered, which is usually a result of the WM being forced to do so because the desktop size (virtualsize) changed. Resolution switching also takes significantly longer than it did before — this is another sign that it switches desktop size (too), not just resolution. First the screen goes black-with-backlight and after roughly 500ms, the TFT screen finally gets the new 640x480 mode signal (I use VGA), which is evidenced by the backlight going briefly off. Expected results: Previous behavior. In other worsd, leave desktop size as-is (and subsequently keep my windows where they are) and _only_ change the resolution. The old switching style is also way faster in that there is no black-with-backlight delay. Additional information: Not all programs are affected. The entire group of Doom engines exhibits the behavior for example, though I found that UnrealTournament99 does not. Both Doom and UT use libSDL-1.2.so.0 (no static SDL as far as I can see). Overriding the system SDL 1.2.14 libraries and using LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point to SDL-1.2.13 libraries brings back the desired behavior. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 509945] New: Enforce packaging of static libraries by rpmlint check
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Dec '17

09 Dec '17

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509945 Summary: Enforce packaging of static libraries by rpmlint check Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: dmueller(a)novell.com ReportedBy: prusnak(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de CC: ro(a)novell.com, mrueckert(a)novell.com, crrodriguez(a)novell.com Found By: Development We are trying to adopt the static libraries packaging scheme described on http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries By adding rpmlint check we will enforce the correct packaging. rpmlint should check whether the package contains *.{a,la} files and perform these steps: a) package contains *.la files, does not contain *.a files -> throw error suggesting the packager to remove *.la files in %install phase b) package contains only *.la and *.a files -> check if the name ends with "-devel-static", throw error otherwise, suggesting the rename c) package contains *.la, *.a files AND *.so files (and probably some includes) -> check if the name ends with "-devel" AND package also provides "-devel-static" symbol, throw error otherwise, suggesting the addition of symbol -> also point out that packager has to be sure that static libraries are absolutely needed in the system. If not the package should be built with --disable-static and *.la files removed in %install phase -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 709260] New: package bzip2 missing documentation
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Dec '17

09 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709260 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709260#c0 Summary: package bzip2 missing documentation Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.4 Version: Final Platform: i686 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.4 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: giecrilj(a)stegny.2a.pl QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB7.1) The documentation for package bzip2 is not installed. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Read /usr/share/doc/packages/bzip2/README. 2. Find the referenced documentation. Actual Results: 1. Complete documentation is available in Postscript form (manual.ps), PDF (manual.pdf) or html (manual.html). A plain-text version of the manual page is available as bzip2.txt. 2. Nope. Expected Results: 2. /usr/share/doc/packages/bzip2/manual.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 661410] New: zypper ar vs. mr: different short option for --refresh
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 22 Sep '17

22 Sep '17

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661410 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661410#c0 Summary: zypper ar vs. mr: different short option for --refresh Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: libzypp AssignedTo: zypp-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: suse-beta(a)cboltz.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Beta-Customer Blocker: --- To enable --refresh for a repo, zypper has different short options: - zypper ar -f - zypper mr -r That's higly confusing. Please allow the same short option for both ar and mr in future versions. (For backward compatibility I'd recommend to allow -f _and_ -r as long as those aren't needed for different functions.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 624196] New: Request for opencv to be built with TBB support
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Aug '17

05 Aug '17

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624196 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624196#c0 Summary: Request for opencv to be built with TBB support Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: alexjironkin(a)gmail.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100714 SUSE/3.6.7-1.1 Firefox/3.6.7 Since version OpenCV 2.1, which comes as part of the base packages now in 11.3 I think, OpenMP has been replaced by TBB. However OpenCV buid without that support on opensuse 11.2. Using TBB will greatly enhance all application using OpenCV e.g. digikam. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. The request is to have either a separate package or enable OpenCV with TBB. Ubuntu 10.4 packages already do that so its stable enough to work with. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 701066] New: mc is eating all of ram after encfs until oom killer start to hunting
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 22 Jun '17

22 Jun '17

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701066 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701066#c0 Summary: mc is eating all of ram after encfs until oom killer start to hunting Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.4 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.4 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: hnsz2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1 After mounting encfs filesystem, if you started mc, its eating any memory, any swap, then oom killer killed the process. [ 7410.101006] Out of memory: Kill process 11459 (mc) score 809 or sacrifice child [ 7410.101006] Killed process 11459 (mc) total-vm:6710300kB, anon-rss:3615048kB, file-rss:264kB Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open a shell, mount an encfs filesystem to a mountpoint. (encfs /data/crypt /mnt/1/ for example) 2. cd to mountpont (cd /mnt/1/) 3. run few ls in the directory until you wait to timeout encfs, and automatically umount the filesystem. 4. start an mc in this directory. Actual Results: oom killer kill mc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 695322] New: home:dannori: Bug
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 23 Apr '17

23 Apr '17

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695322 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695322#c0 Summary: home:dannori: Bug Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.4 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: 3rd party software AssignedTo: dannoritzer(a)web.de ReportedBy: melchiaros(a)aol.com QAContact: opensuse-communityscreening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Found By: Other Blocker: No Hi, I try to install ghdl from your repo. Yast shows me that ghdl-grt needs libada >= 3.1. A look at my system shows that I´ve installed libada46 from devel:/gcc. So all what ghdl need should be there?! Please make a correction when it is necessary. Greetings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5