June 2008 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 395696] New: Filesystem destroyd
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395696 Summary: Filesystem destroyd Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Beta 3 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: gjn(a)gjn.priv.at QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Beta-Customer A situation like this destroys the Filesystem. On console 1 (root) mc (Midnight Commander) is open on a nfs mounted Partition A other task do a reboot or a shutdown. The system can't reboot or shutdown. After a reset the "local" Partition's must be restored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 388037] New: Network is working only when managed by network manager but not by ifup
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=388037 Summary: Network is working only when managed by network manager but not by ifup Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Beta 2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Network AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: romain.pelissier(a)gmail.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- During the setup, the user have the option to manage the network configuration by using the network manager system or ifup. On my computer, the ifup option never works and I have to switch to network manager option. I don't really know the difference between the 2 options but since it is working with network manager, why my network cards are not working with ifup? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 389791] New: LSB: result of sysconf(_SC_ARG_MAX) is different from #define ARG_MAX
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389791 Summary: LSB: result of sysconf(_SC_ARG_MAX) is different from #define ARG_MAX Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Beta 2 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: jdluhos(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Found by the LSB test suite. The result of the sysconf(_SC_ARG_MAX) is 2097152, while ARG_MAX is defined to be 131072 in limits.h; the LSB compliance requires that either both are set to the same value, or ARG_MAX is undefined if there is no hard limit. Additionally, it seems that the result of sysconf() is wrong because execve() fails when trying to supply 2097152 arguments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 245732] New: openSUSE 10.3 SUSEQA Tracker Bug
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245732 Summary: openSUSE 10.3 SUSEQA Tracker Bug Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Alpha 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: chuller(a)novell.com ReportedBy: seife(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Tracker bug for Bugs reported by SUSE QA against openSUSE 10.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 43

[Bug 250624] New: APM should be built as a module
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250624 Summary: APM should be built as a module Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Alpha 1plus Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel AssignedTo: kernel-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: seife(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de CC: hmacht(a)novell.com, aj(a)novell.com, behlert(a)novell.com, trenn(a)novell.com, fseidel(a)novell.com OtherBugsDependingO 245732 nThis: We should finally stop supporting APM. The first step is to no longer build APM into the kernel, but build it as a module. This should be done now, so that we can get this tested early enough for CODE 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 11

[Bug 390838] New: yast prefers wlan over eth during installation
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390838 Summary: yast prefers wlan over eth during installation Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Beta 3 Platform: PowerPC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation AssignedTo: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de ReportedBy: olh(a)novell.com QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Found By: --- 11.0beta3 on PS3 A PS3 has an ethernet and a wlan interface. The ethernet interface has a cable connected. I dont know if the wlan interface can be used at all in our office. After an installation from DVD, with autoconfiguration and gnome desktop, the configured interface was wlan. Why did yast prefer wlan over eth? What is supposed to happen if a system has an ethernet card with cable plugged in and an (unused) wlan device? Also, after yast2 lan was started, the gnome start menu still had the Network: wireless, Interface: wlan0 active. This changed after a rcnetwork restart. I expected that yast does update such info. Maybe its a networkmanager thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 387064] New: hwinfo finds only one monitor
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387064 Summary: hwinfo finds only one monitor Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Beta 2 Platform: PowerPC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: snwint(a)novell.com ReportedBy: olh(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de CC: power-bugs(a)forge.provo.novell.com Found By: --- Created an attachment (id=212560) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=212560) blackberry.tar.gz hwinfo should find two monitors, but only one is found. blackberry:~ # find /proc/device-tree/ -name "*EDID*" /proc/device-tree/pci@0,f0000000/ATY,SimoneParent@10/ATY,Simone_B@1/EDID /proc/device-tree/pci@0,f0000000/ATY,SimoneParent@10/ATY,Simone_A@0/EDID blackberry:~ # hwinfo --monitor 25: None 00.0: 10002 LCD Monitor [Created at monitor.122] Unique ID: rdCR.6_bEJJwTRD2 Parent ID: tMi7.rRsYDNdzxZ2 Hardware Class: monitor Model: "PHILIPS Philips 200W" Vendor: PHL "PHILIPS" Device: eisa 0x0832 "Philips 200W" Serial ID: "VN 015006" Resolution: 720x400@70Hz Resolution: 640x480@60Hz Resolution: 640x480@67Hz Resolution: 640x480@72Hz Resolution: 640x480@75Hz Resolution: 800x600@56Hz Resolution: 800x600@60Hz Resolution: 800x600@72Hz Resolution: 800x600@75Hz Resolution: 832x624@75Hz Resolution: 1024x768@60Hz Resolution: 1024x768@70Hz Resolution: 1024x768@75Hz Resolution: 1280x1024@75Hz Resolution: 1152x864@70Hz Resolution: 1152x864@75Hz Resolution: 1280x960@60Hz Resolution: 1280x1024@60Hz Resolution: 1680x1050@60Hz Size: 433x271 mm Detailed Timings #0: Resolution: 1680x1050 Horizontal: 1680 1784 1960 2240 (+104 +280 +560) +hsync Vertical: 1050 1053 1059 1089 (+3 +9 +39) +vsync Frequencies: 146.00 MHz, 65.18 kHz, 59.85 Hz Driver Info #0: Max. Resolution: 1680x1050 Vert. Sync Range: 56-85 Hz Hor. Sync Range: 30-93 kHz Bandwidth: 146 MHz Config Status: cfg=new, avail=yes, need=no, active=unknown Attached to: #5 (VGA compatible controller) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

[Bug 224139] New: ltrace makes thunderbird crash
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224139 Summary: ltrace makes thunderbird crash Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: RC 2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: mfabian(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de If one tries to attach ltrace to thunderbird, thunderbird crashes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 11

[Bug 398286] New: KDE4: kontact IMAP groupware functionality broken
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398286 User danielstefanmader(a)web.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398286#c398285 Summary: KDE4: kontact IMAP groupware functionality broken Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: RC 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE4 Applications AssignedTo: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de ReportedBy: danielstefanmader(a)web.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Similar to Kontact/KDE3 in bug #398285, the IMAP groupware functionality is broken here, too. I have not verified but it is very likely that manually completing kmailrc might be a workaround... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 231196] New: htdig-3.2.0b6-45: left shift count >= width of type
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231196 Summary: htdig-3.2.0b6-45: left shift count >= width of type Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: SuSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: dcb314(a)hotmail.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de I just tried to compile package htdig-3.2.0b6-45 The compiler said Display.cc:1229: warning: left shift count >= width of type The source code is time_t eternity = ~(1<<(sizeof(time_t)*8-1)); // will be the largest value holdable by a time_t I agree with the compiler. Suggest new code time_t eternity = ~(1UL << (sizeof(time_t)*8-1)); // will be the largest value holdable by a time_t -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7