October 2008 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 405086] New: upgrade pidgin for xmpp stuff
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 30 Mar '09

30 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=405086 Summary: upgrade pidgin for xmpp stuff Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Final Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: X11 Applications AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: jengelh(a)gmx.de QAContact: sndirsch(a)novell.com Found By: Beta-Customer pidgin/libpurple 2.4.1 from openSUSE 11.0 fails to authenticate against the openfire3 xmpp server and GoogleTalk (also XMPP); however, the pidgin 2.4.1 from /repositories/GNOME:/Community/openSUSE_10.3 worked with it, as does the 2.4.2 from Gnome:/Community/openSUSE_11.0 now. Please fix the opensuse pidgin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 385376] New: Package 'python' does not build correctly on PPC64
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 30 Mar '09

30 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=385376 Summary: Package 'python' does not build correctly on PPC64 Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Final Platform: PowerPC-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Development AssignedTo: pth(a)novell.com ReportedBy: sergiodj(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Hi, I'm currently trying to build the last version of Python's src.rpm (namely python-2.5-19.6.src.rpm) on a biarch machine (i.e., 64-bit kernel and mostly 32-bit userspace apps). The 32-bit build works properly: #> rpmbuild --target ppc -bb SPECS/python.spec << OK >> What happens is that, when I try to build it for PPC64, some errors occurs: #> rpmbuild --target ppc64 -bb SPECS/python.spec .. Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 Requires: python = 2.5 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit) RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/python-2.5-build/usr/lib64/python2.5/lib-dynload/_sqlite3.so Note that Python got compiled successfuly, and all the tests were done without errors. Only after that this error came up. I'd like to know what can be done to fix this. Actually, what's happening is that I don't have (and haven't found) the package sqlite3 for PPC64. I've also tried to build it from its src.rpm, but fell in another dependency case and gave up. Obs.: I've made a tiny modification on Python's spec file in order to be able to compile it for PPC64: --- SPECS/python.spec 2008-01-10 09:59:23.000000000 -0800 +++ SPECS/python.spec.new 2008-04-30 11:11:49.000000000 -0700 @@ -217,6 +217,9 @@ # use rpm_opt_flags ######################################## export OPT="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" +%ifarch ppc64 ia64 +export CC="gcc -m64" +%endif ######################################## # regenerate ######################################## -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 433939] New: multi-display bits ...
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 30 Mar '09

30 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433939 Summary: multi-display bits ... Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Beta 2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME AssignedTo: bnc-team-gnome(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: mmeeks(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- I hot plug a monitor; nothing happens - do we not get an event we can trigger firing up the display-properties thingy ? Anyhow - I then click on the display applet - which shows me only having one display plugged in: which is odd, since when I run gnome-display-properties it clearly shows that there are two ;-) What's the story there ? photo attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 381135] New: [multiscreen]: Print screen messed up
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 30 Mar '09

30 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381135 Summary: [multiscreen]: Print screen messed up Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME AssignedTo: bnc-team-gnome(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: captain.magnus(a)opensuse.org QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Blocks: 374148 Found By: --- Created an attachment (id=208796) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=208796) Screenshot I have my internal LCD (1450x1050) on the right and an external CRT (1024x768) on the left. I've added a panel to the left. See attached screenshot for some cool wierdness. Note; On the left, the panel IS on the bottom right. I can not see the icons on the left that's revealed in the screenshot (they would show up if I go 'arrange icons') -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 381030] New: [multiscreen] A few UI suggestions for gnome-display-properties
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 30 Mar '09

30 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381030 Summary: [multiscreen] A few UI suggestions for gnome-display- properties Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME AssignedTo: bnc-team-gnome(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: vuntz(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Blocks: 374148 Found By: --- We have "Resolution", "Refresh Rate:" and "Rotation". They should all have semi-colons. "Detect Displays" is really too wide. It shouldn't be as wide as the window. Title of the window contains "monitor". First option contains "screen". Last button contains "displays". See where I'm heading? :-) Monitor is probably the best term to use. Not quite sure why "Mirror Screens" is at the top. Looks weird to me. I'd try putting it just before the "Detect Displays" button. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 432822] New: Intel GMA 4500 MHD internal graphics chipset fails with openSUSE 11.0 ( Driver not included?)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 30 Mar '09

30 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432822 Summary: Intel GMA 4500 MHD internal graphics chipset fails with openSUSE 11.0 (Driver not included?) Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.0 Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: X.Org AssignedTo: sndirsch(a)novell.com ReportedBy: kevin.dupuy(a)opensuse.org QAContact: xorg-maintainer-bugs(a)forge.provo.novell.com Found By: --- The Intel GMA 4500MHD internal graphics chipset included with recent laptops *completely fail* under openSUSE 11.0. The only thing brought up when the X server starts up is a gray screen that fades out into a dark grey screen (pics coming in a few minutes). The framebuffer graphics in GRUB, the early bootsplash, and YaST installation do work, albeit not at the correct resolution (although that is more related to the resolution of my PC, so it's not part of the bug report). After some research, apparently the driver for this chipset wasn't released early enough to be included in openSUSE 11.0, and I'm not sure if it is scheduled to be included in openSUSE 11.1 (I'm also not sure exactly what drivers this card requires, BTW). So can we get this included with openSUSE 11.1, and what about an update to 11.0, since this is a problem for a bunch of people who buy these laptops, perhaps expecting the graphics card to work out of the box since it is an Intel card, which have good track records with Linux compatibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 36

[Bug 368800] New: build status wrongly inaccuracy
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 29 Mar '09

29 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368800 Summary: build status wrongly inaccuracy Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: poeml(a)novell.com QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com Found By: --- The build status "succeeded" often doesn't reflect reality. A packager frequently sees the following. First, after a commit: poeml@batavia510 ~/bs/openSUSE:Tools/osc % osc results CentOS_5 i586 scheduled CentOS_5 x86_64 building Debian_Etch i586 scheduled Debian_Etch x86_64 scheduled Fedora_7 i586 succeeded Fedora_7 x86_64 scheduled Fedora_8 i586 succeeded Fedora_8 x86_64 succeeded Fedora_Core_6 i586 succeeded Fedora_Core_6 x86_64 succeeded Mandriva_2006 i586 succeeded Mandriva_2007 i586 succeeded Mandriva_2007 x86_64 succeeded Mandriva_2008 i586 succeeded Mandriva_2008 x86_64 succeeded openSUSE_10.2 i586 succeeded openSUSE_10.2 x86_64 succeeded openSUSE_10.3 i586 succeeded openSUSE_10.3 x86_64 succeeded openSUSE_Factory i586 succeeded openSUSE_Factory x86_64 succeeded RHEL_5 i586 succeeded RHEL_5 x86_64 succeeded SLES_9 i586 disabled SLES_9 x86_64 disabled SLE_10 i586 succeeded SLE_10 x86_64 succeeded SUSE_Linux_10.1 i586 succeeded SUSE_Linux_10.1 x86_64 succeeded xUbuntu_6.06 i586 succeeded xUbuntu_7.04 i586 succeeded xUbuntu_7.10 i586 succeeded xUbuntu_7.10 x86_64 succeeded Fine -- I just don't believe it's succeeded already, because I committed only a minute ago. But I know what to think. Later, things get confusing: poeml@batavia510 ~/bs/openSUSE:Tools/osc % osc results CentOS_5 i586 finished CentOS_5 x86_64 building Debian_Etch i586 succeeded Debian_Etch x86_64 succeeded Fedora_7 i586 succeeded Fedora_7 x86_64 succeeded Fedora_8 i586 succeeded Fedora_8 x86_64 succeeded Fedora_Core_6 i586 finished Fedora_Core_6 x86_64 succeeded Mandriva_2006 i586 succeeded Mandriva_2007 i586 finished Mandriva_2007 x86_64 succeeded Mandriva_2008 i586 succeeded Mandriva_2008 x86_64 building openSUSE_10.2 i586 building openSUSE_10.2 x86_64 succeeded openSUSE_10.3 i586 finished openSUSE_10.3 x86_64 succeeded openSUSE_Factory i586 finished openSUSE_Factory x86_64 succeeded RHEL_5 i586 building RHEL_5 x86_64 succeeded SLES_9 i586 disabled SLES_9 x86_64 disabled SLE_10 i586 succeeded SLE_10 x86_64 succeeded SUSE_Linux_10.1 i586 succeeded SUSE_Linux_10.1 x86_64 succeeded xUbuntu_6.06 i586 succeeded xUbuntu_7.04 i586 succeeded xUbuntu_7.10 i586 finished xUbuntu_7.10 x86_64 succeeded Can you tell which of them are already succeeded, and which ones are still "succeeded"? It would be better if the commit would invalidate the "succeeded" state. The "succeeded should only be reached again once the package has actually been built (successfully of course). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 405104] New: NetworkManager-kde-0.7r821737-5.7 doesn't connect
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 29 Mar '09

29 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=405104 Summary: NetworkManager-kde-0.7r821737-5.7 doesn't connect Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.0 Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Network AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: dl9pf(a)gmx.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Created an attachment (id=225157) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=225157) Log of NetworkManager I updated to NetworkManager-kde-0.7r821737-5.7. But as before it refuses to connect to my wlan. nm-applet just works. Attached is /var/log/NetworkManager of a run with knetworkmanager and a run with nm-applet. I was able to establish a connection only with nm-applet. Environment: openSUSE 11.0 $ hwinfo --wlan 01: PCI 800.0: 0282 WLAN controller [Created at pci.310] UDI: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_8086_4229 Unique ID: y9sn.AI5DsHTk+F7 Parent ID: hoOk.0O_DsNnPKTD SysFS ID: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.2/0000:08:00.0 SysFS BusID: 0000:08:00.0 Hardware Class: network Model: "Intel PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or AGN Network Connection" Vendor: pci 0x8086 "Intel Corporation" Device: pci 0x4229 "PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or AGN Network Connection" SubVendor: pci 0x8086 "Intel Corporation" SubDevice: pci 0x1101 Revision: 0x61 Driver: "iwl4965" Driver Modules: "iwl4965" Device File: wlan0 Features: WLAN Memory Range: 0xfa000000-0xfa001fff (rw,non-prefetchable) IRQ: 4345 (no events) HW Address: 00:13:e8:68:51:9b Link detected: yes WLAN channels: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 100 104 108 112 116 120 124 128 132 136 140 WLAN frequencies: 2.412 2.417 2.422 2.427 2.432 2.437 2.442 2.447 2.452 2.457 2.462 2.467 2.472 5.18 5.2 5.22 5.24 5.26 5.28 5.3 5.32 5.5 5.52 5.54 5.56 5.58 5.6 5.62 5.64 5.66 5.68 5.7 WLAN encryption modes: WEP40 WEP104 TKIP CCMP WLAN authentication modes: open sharedkey wpa-psk wpa-eap Module Alias: "pci:v00008086d00004229sv00008086sd00001101bc02sc80i00" Driver Info #0: Driver Status: iwl4965 is active Driver Activation Cmd: "modprobe iwl4965" Config Status: cfg=no, avail=yes, need=no, active=unknown Attached to: #13 (PCI bridge) AP: WEP, 128bit, SharedKey -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 439287] New: not all POSTFIX_ADD_* values are properly handled by SuSEconfig.postfix
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 29 Mar '09

29 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439287 Summary: not all POSTFIX_ADD_* values are properly handled by SuSEconfig.postfix Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: darinper(a)cognigencorp.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- SuSEconfig.postfix does not properly handle all Postfix configuration values when using POSTFIX_ADD_* in /etc/sysconfig/postfix, namely those which contain capital letters, i.e. lmtp_tls_CAfile, lmtp_tls_CApath, smtp_tls_CAfile, smtp_tls_CApath, smtpd_tls_CAfile, and smtpd_tls_CApath. The block of code in SuSEconfig.postfix which processes the values indiscriminately performs a upper to lower translation on all of these values which breaks the various parameters. This effect ALL versions of openSUSE and SuSE enterprise products. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 416956] New: Mounting and umount of external USB drive as non-root user does not work
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 29 Mar '09

29 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416956 Summary: Mounting and umount of external USB drive as non-root user does not work Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Final Platform: x86 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.0 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: digital_tank(a)hotmail.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Community User Hello, mounting and unmounting of external USB drives as non-root user does not work. Fixed it by editing: /usr/share/PolicyKit/policy/org.freedesktop.hal.storage.policy <action id="org.freedesktop.hal.storage.mount-removable"> => <allow_inactive>no</allow_inactive> to <allow_inactive>yes</allow_inactive> <action id="org.freedesktop.hal.storage.eject"> => <allow_inactive>no</allow_inactive> to <allow_inactive>yes</allow_inactive> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 30