December 2006 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 118131] OpenOffice fonts, both UI and document, are unacceptable
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=118131 sven.burmeister(a)gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven.burmeister(a)gmx.net ------- Comment #56 from sven.burmeister(a)gmx.net 2006-12-07 09:29 MST ------- Regarding comment #25. In OO's settings there is a setting "use systen fonts". What does that one change? In 10.0 and 10.1 for me it changed the fonts used for GUI from unacceptable to as cleanly rendered as TrueType fonts like Arial are by the bytecode-interpreter. If as clean fonts (without aa) were possible in 10.1 why should they not be possible in 10.2 anymore? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 118131] OpenOffice fonts, both UI and document, are unacceptable
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=118131 mfabian(a)novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lavrinenko_alex(a)mail.ru ------- Comment #55 from mfabian(a)novell.com 2006-12-07 09:26 MST ------- *** Bug 217704 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 179623] installation source only needs relative path
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179623 jsrain(a)novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |s.handgraaf(a)xs4all.nl ------- Comment #10 from jsrain(a)novell.com 2006-12-07 09:21 MST ------- Can you write whole example of FTP url with relative and absolute path? For absolute path, you MUST double the slash in order to distinguish it from relative path. There must be a slash in any case in order to separate host from the path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 224985] VUL-0: dazuko 2.3.2 release
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224985 ------- Comment #14 from meissner(a)novell.com 2006-12-07 08:57 MST ------- talked to Harald, he is OK with the upgrade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 216052] New: openSUSE 10.2 installation on Mac mini requiring CD4
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216052 Summary: openSUSE 10.2 installation on Mac mini requiring CD4 Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Beta 1 Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: SuSE Linux 10.1 Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: tsuroerusu(a)gmail.com QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com When installing openSUSE 10.2 Beta 1 on my PowerPC Mac mini, it wanted CD4 just to install one single package (xorg-x11-fonts-7.2-3.noarch.rpm). This is really annoying if you are not aware of it, and especially since we're only talking ONE single package. This breaks the "3-CDs for a default install" rule, and is not a very pretty surprise, since you can't tell YaST to just grab that package off the web during the moment you see that it needs CD4. I also noticed a bunch of Qt4 libraries being installed, and honestly, why install those out of the box? The typical user of SUSE is probably not a KDE hacker, and if he is, he knows how to install Qt4 himself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 13

[Bug 204061] minimal installation not possible with just one cd
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204061 lrupp(a)novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #12 from lrupp(a)novell.com 2006-12-07 08:43 MST ------- minimal install should be possible with i386 and x86_64 now. Not with minimal+X11 and not with additional hardware packages. 800MB as "minimal" is not what I think about minimal - so we should fix the patterns for 10.3 as soon as possible ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 224985] VUL-0: dazuko 2.3.2 release
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224985 ------- Comment #13 from mt(a)novell.com 2006-12-07 08:36 MST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > ... according to Marius the userland is compatible. I got confirmation about the compatibility from John Ogness (author): "[...] Yes. The low-level Dazuko device driver protocol has remained 100% backwards-compatible all the way to version 1.0. This is something the project has been very strict about. Any application that has ever been compiled with an official Dazuko release (or version 2.0.6-pre2) will be able to run with the latest version of Dazuko: 2.3.2. [...]" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 224882] New: sane-frontends still installs intro /usr/X11R6/bin prefix
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224882 Summary: sane-frontends still installs intro /usr/X11R6/bin prefix Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: RC 4 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: jsmeix(a)novell.com ReportedBy: stbinner(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de The sane-frontends packages still installs its binaries into the /usr/X11R6/bin prefix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 223577] New: Upgrade delta iso from Beta 2 to RC1 - Fatal error caused while upgrading CD2 x86
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223577 Summary: Upgrade delta iso from Beta 2 to RC1 - Fatal error caused while upgrading CD2 x86 Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: RC 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: SuSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Blocker Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: alexandr.petrovsky(a)avalon.ru QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Problem (reproducible): I cannot upgrade Beta 2 x86 CD2 (made from Beta 1 x86 iso + delta) to RC1 because applydeltaiso has printed next error: output: reading 183729012 bytes from old iso...done 3ddiag.i586 (bzip):applying delta payload uncompress error the command is (CD1, 3, 4, 5 are OK): applydeltaiso /mnt/hda6/suse/openSUSE-10.2-Beta2-i386-CD2.iso /mnt/hdd3/downloads/openSUSE\ Distribution\ Delta\ ISO\ from\ 10.2\ Beta2\ to\ 10.2\ RC1/openSUSE-10.2-Beta2_RC1-i386-CD1.delta.iso /windows/C/susecd2/openSUSE-10.2-RC1-i386-CD2.iso Configuration: openSUSE 10.2 beta 2 upgraded from Beta 1 (clean install) Duron 1600, 1G RAM, have drive space md5sum of my Beta 2 CD 2 made from Beta 1 CD 2 9f1cf266b89334faa818bdb82bb3c5bf openSUSE-10.2-Beta2-i386-CD2.iso md5sum of my delta Beta2toRC1 be2ff605609404c7d8698463dd341373 openSUSE-10.2-Beta2_RC1-i386-CD2.delta.iso -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 1

[Bug 223510] New: OpenOffice_org i586 and x86_64 packages conflicts
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223510 Summary: OpenOffice_org i586 and x86_64 packages conflicts Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: RC 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Blocker Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation AssignedTo: aj(a)novell.com ReportedBy: pmladek(a)novell.com QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com I have installed openSUSE-10.2 on x86_64 from DVD5-x86_64 with the default selection for the KDE desktop. Then I added the suggested installation source: http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source Then I installed the pattern "GNOME Base System". Finally, I tried to install OpenOffice_org-gnome. YaST started to prefere the x86_64 package from http://download.opensuse.org. It required the other x86_64 packages (OpenOffice_org, OpenOffice_org-kde, ...). They conflicted with the already installed i586 packages from the DVD. Hmm, I am afraid that we need to remove the 64-bit packages also from the http source that is suggested by default. I am not sure if it is a blocker but ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4