* Dave Howorth
Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 07/11/13 00:29, Carlos E. R. escribió:
Many people complain because of this, an many turn away and do not register. This is a known fact.
It is my belief that this is not the kind of bug reporter we want to hear about at all.
I find it worrying that some people were suggesting that giving deliberate lies in response to questions was normal behaviour, as opposed to trying to fix the software to ask reasonable questions.
That avenue has been attempted and there is supposed to be a link available where that information is not required but is not widely known. If one desires to make a bug report and does not want to divuldge personal information, why would it be better to make the bug report be as much later as obtaining a change in the requirements would unlikely take? Be real, the bug reports are desired more than the accuracy of the information requested to obtain sales promotion data. The logon data appears little changed from what I remember of the earlier Novell site.
I find the notion that we should be screening open source community participants on the basis of the strength of their moral principles even more worrying.
World governance is in enough trouble as it is; we need all the honesty we can get (Apologies for the OT opinion).
A noble outlook, .....
PS The bizarre subject is because Cristian's email is blacklisted at URIBL. I let him know, but have seen no acknowledgment or change.
Ah, so one case can be justified where another cannot. You contradict your own standing by providing a "deliverate lie" in the Subject: ..... -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org