On Sunday 22 June 2008, Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Sunday 2008-06-22 at 09:08 +0100, peter nikolic wrote:
On Sunday 22 June 2008, Rajko M. wrote:
On Saturday 21 June 2008 09:53:51 pm Raskolnikov Tkachuk wrote: ...
Yes...it's the FIRST version of KDE listed, and not marked with nearly enough warning that it's incomplete, and completely UNLIKE what they might have heard about the KDE that people have been running for years (KDE 3.x).
So what in your parlance: - complete - what is enough marking
Thats very easy
1 KDE3 fully functional desktop with no faulty bits that just works
2 KDE4 USE it at your own risk large amounts missing feature missing configs missing function missing
3 GNOME do with as you please
And why do you have to insult gnome and its users? I find that line offensive.
-- Cheers, Carlos E. R.
Well edit to suit your tastes then it is not an INSULT at all so go reboot your brain and re-read the comment . I personally have no use for Gnome at all and think it sucks but i keep that to my self and just dont use it if you want to cahnge the Gnome to suit your tastes be my guest just dont give me a hard time for something it is not .. -- SuSE Linux 10.3-Alpha3. (Linux is like a wigwam - no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org