El lun, 18-02-2008 a las 07:21 +0000, ne.. escribió:
On Feb 18, 2008 7:13 AM, Hudibras
wrote: completely configurable. Kde4 is not. So, what else can I say? It's doesn't blame on me that I have to remove .kde4 home directory all time, or use any other navigator, because Konqueror4 crashes even when I enter Packman site, a site where is not flash plugin, for instance. I understand opensource is always developing, but I consider a very important thing to have a "stable" release, completely usable, configurable and reliable, and kde4 is not like this. Sorry, it's my opinion. Well, tell you what. Since all you do is complain while it has been explained to that
[...] this is a work in progress, why don't you go use something else. If KDE3 works for you, use it. For me KDE4 works _without_ krashing and I have very few problems with it. So far all you have done is gripe, and that is putting it very mildly. I suggest you take it elsewhere. Those of us who know what the KDE & SUSE devs are up against know how encourage them without having folks like you constantly sniping at them.
ne...
I think that all comments I made have been polite and not gripe, but if you think so, I'm sorry for you. What I've been remarking is that in any forced situations, kde3 (even beta versions!) does not crash or fail, and kde4 do. I don't understand why any critics and comments would become unpleasant here. My aim was only to give support to make a great kde4 desktop. But if you can't see, It doesn't blame on me. Cheers, AOP.
-- Registered Linux User # 125653 (http://counter.li.org) Certified: 75% bastard, 42% of which is tard. http://www.thespark.com/bastardtest Now accepting personal mail for GMail invites.
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org