On 05/05/2017 16:50, Rainer Fiebig wrote:
What counts is perception by your customers, the users. And the "leap" backwards in numbering will undoubtedly cause disbelief and confusion.
Now that's a difficult situation. But there seems to be some time until release. And there may be a way out.
What came to my mind was
"Leap 42.15"
Following releases would be Leap 42.151, 42.16 etc. +1 This is the first sensible suggestion I've seen so far although I see nothing wrong with carrying on with 42.3 then 43.1 or even 42.4. The 42.15 suggestion satisfies the need to have the name linked to the SLE version. From a packager's point of view the macros follow SLE anyway and I've never had the need to use the %leap_version macro and never will. Dave Plater -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org