On 09.01.2017 10:40, Richard Brown wrote:
On 9 January 2017 at 08:43, Stephan Kulow
wrote: Am 08.01.2017 um 00:29 schrieb Richard Brown:
On 7 January 2017 at 23:09, Administrator
wrote: The discussion is about consensus. openSUSE is a collaborative effort not a fiefdom. For matters such as this I’m happy that there is engaged discussion and I wish more people were contributing. If you wish to help, you could devise a more efficient way to discuss these matters and assess the support for the various competing proposals.
The ‘resolution’ you propose doesn’t have the support of the majority of members, so it’s no resolution. The resolution which does have support is to leave it as is.
Having people take the 'do first, then discuss' approach at least means any subsequent discussions that appear are framed in the context of the actual contributions, something that actually works and actually exists, which goes a long way towards ensuring the discussions are more productive than debating concepts and theoretical problems.
But in his very example, you're the one undoing something. And IMO here *needs* to come discussion first. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org