-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 06/18/2015 01:53 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2015 schrieb James Mason:
So, I think the obvious choice, assuming the maintainers agree, is to repurpose Evergreen for the SLE-based releases.
openSUSE Evergreen 12.0 -> SLES 12 openSUSE Evergreen 12.1 -> SLES 12 SP1
I don't believe there are any actual version releases of Evergreen, just repos for older versions of openSUSE, so although the version number moves backwards relative to what Evergreen supported, the name is all new as far as distros go, and carries just the right message/purpose. That's a nice idea, but it comes with a problem: The Evergreen team has officially stated that they will provide Evergreen support for 13.1 - both on the mailinglist and on https://en.opensuse.org/Evergreen (and quite some people (including me ;-) run servers with 13.1 for that reason).
This means we'll get a naming conflict with SLES 13 SP1 with your proposal :-(
Not true; Evergreen project provides longer-term support for existing openSUSE distributions; they don't (at this time) make their own releases; openSUSE 13.1 will *not* change names to openSUSE Evergreen 13.1 if/when the Evergreen team takes over support. - -- James Mason Technical Architect, Public Cloud openSUSE Member SUSE jmason@suse.com - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUSECon 2015: Register at susecon.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVh6xSAAoJEBs5UYhsRJAjmZ0IAJBDCdtEnt+3U1MbQw66ICP+ 49YYNnqgUIxFYyMwMB1DkRVBcygSBt9DZivZysGeXs6pTz4+JKKXCXLVmTCrvmeQ ezY+8u6U0Vip7iwBJQEDkdqKm6grAJXJwlIff7JNP1Ms7uZTf5CcEBQ1RbLJ7X1L Q2SikHR0chwUcwLml/4lMY/yRzwKt2zFNxTjkzk9+k4QKeN0910/X0YbnuKCYnQE vUiRKK2qkQ98V+JPd7AlziboS+tjOoj855lPq2RNt6d2YQXB+zHtFCAZjqxAdfbA uzcX2d87euWLTOpLCVdeY5egFFlV1ntyQjTVhP8Kg49Fx9LwyG4LCWgHFDFFJ4Y= =baqd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org