Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:22:03AM +0100, Kálmán Kéménczy wrote:
Many of bugs I reported ended up in this state. Examples are broken intel graphics since 11.3 (but I'm at least reminded to test the latest release every 2 months or so), reported bug in nmap with exact line number and described error. The same for libacl. Vim parses the gcc output wrong since we use gcc 4.5 and many others. The last four are fixable in an hour, but the assigned people don't care for years. I'm not counting gnome bugs which are assigned for years to gnome screening team and are not touched at all by anybody.
In that case QA should step in! every bug has a QA member, we have to ask them ehat is the problem, how can we help to move forward, should we change some process or what is their opinion?
qa@suse.de really is a virtual team... Consisting of 0 (zero) people for openSUSE in Bugzilla context.
There is some community testing team led by Holgi as far as I know, but I am not sure it takes care of reviewing bugzilla entries.
There is a community-screening list address, but I have never seen anything posted there.
The bnc-team-screening team are 1 or 2 chinese QA engineers that assign bugs away from the screening address to the maintainers.
What does 'bnc' mean? How about the process flow - surely we have some existing (even if long outdated) process for how bugs are processed? Given the reported state of things, I'm guessing this process has largely fallen apart. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (11.8°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org