Okay, my thought was obviously wrong, I see. Kevin: could you check if this mail was HTML only? Perhaps the list manager can only append the info to the plain text part? Daniel Am Dienstag, 28. Januar 2003 02:24 schrieb Kevin McLauchlan:
Implying that "she" already had everybody's address? The copy that I received had only her address in the "From:", and had only the list address in the "To:". But somehow, it got past the list-server's function that automatically attaches the "Unsubscribe" info.
Can anybody tell how that was done?
Here's the original header:
Received: from lists.suse.com (lists.suse.com [217.9.113.69]) by in2.magma.ca (Magma's Mail Server) with SMTP id h0RJPDaY027635 for
; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:25:13 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 5753 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2003 19:25:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact suse-kde-help@suse.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: mailto:suse-kde@suse.com List-Help: mailto:suse-kde-help@suse.com List-Unsubscribe: mailto:suse-kde-unsubscribe-kevinmcl=magma.ca@suse.com List-Subscribe: mailto:suse-kde-subscribe@suse.com X-Mailinglist: suse-kde Delivered-To: mailing list suse-kde@suse.com Received: (qmail 5733 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2003 19:25:08 -0000 To: suse-kde@suse.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.11 July 24, 2002 From: Brenda Gardner
Message-ID:
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:38:52 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM119/03/M/IBM(Release 6.0 [IBM]|December 16, 2002) at 01/27/2003 12:24:57, Serialize complete at 01/27/2003 12:24:57 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0069931A86256CBB_=" Subject: [suse-kde] unscribe Status: R X-Status: N I'm not great at interpreting headers. Maybe somebody else with skills could offer a clue? Offline, of course. This is already too OT.
Thanks,
/kevin