Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2020-01/msg00296.html Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-01/ During February, I could not do much reproducible-builds work because one week went away for HackWeek and two more weeks I spent sick at home. I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200303/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 12692 (+123) build-tried: 12683 (+123) build-failed: 40 (+3) build-n-a: 85 (+3) build-succeeded: 12558 (+117) build-official-failed+na: 92 (-28) build-compare-failed: 391 (-2) build-compare-succeeded: 12167 (+119) verify-failed: 519 (-24) verified-semi-reproducible: 11371 (-300) verified-bit-identical: 0 (+0) bit-by-bit-identical: 11804 (+139) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 747 (-26) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 754 (-22) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200303/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200303/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 4 were in ring0 42 were in ring1 That makes it 46/2901 => 1.59 % which is below the overall average of 391/12558 => 3.11 % 747/12558 => 5.95 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible newly unreproducible core packages: bison possibly from PGO or LTO Ciao Bernhard M. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org