Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (352 mails)

< Previous Next >
[opensuse-factory] openSUSE reproducible builds status 2020-02
Hi,

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2020-01/msg00296.html

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-01/

During February, I could not do much reproducible-builds work
because one week went away for HackWeek and two more weeks
I spent sick at home.


I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200303/ today
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 12692 (+123)
build-tried: 12683 (+123)
build-failed: 40 (+3)
build-n-a: 85 (+3)
build-succeeded: 12558 (+117)
build-official-failed+na: 92 (-28)
build-compare-failed: 391 (-2)
build-compare-succeeded: 12167 (+119)
verify-failed: 519 (-24)
verified-semi-reproducible: 11371 (-300)
verified-bit-identical: 0 (+0)
bit-by-bit-identical: 11804 (+139)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 747 (-26)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 754 (-22)


https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200303/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200303/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
4 were in ring0
42 were in ring1

That makes it 46/2901 => 1.59 %
which is below the overall average of
391/12558 => 3.11 %

747/12558 => 5.95 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible


newly unreproducible core packages:
bison
possibly from PGO or LTO


Ciao
Bernhard M.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
This Thread
  • No further messages