Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2019-12/msg00174.html Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2019-12/ This month saw a bit less activity, but all python modules suffering from https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1094323 got a SR And https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/766399 should make various doxygen docs reproducible again (alsa, fltk, hwinfo). I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200127/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 12569 (+11) build-tried: 12560 (+10) build-failed: 37 (-12) build-n-a: 82 (+3) build-succeeded: 12441 (+19) build-official-failed+na: 120 (+20) build-compare-failed: 393 (+13) build-compare-succeeded: 12048 (+6) verify-failed: 543 (-7) verified-semi-reproducible: 11671 (-85) verified-bit-identical: 0 (+0) bit-by-bit-identical: 11665 (+3) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 773 (+16) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200127/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200127/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 2 were in ring0 45 were in ring1 That makes it 47/2901 => 1.62 % which is below the overall average of 393/12441 => 3.16 % 773/12441 => 6.21 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible Ciao Bernhard M.