Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (365 mails)

< Previous Next >
[opensuse-factory] openSUSE reproducible builds status 2020-01
Hi,

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2019-12/msg00174.html

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2019-12/


This month saw a bit less activity, but all python modules suffering
from https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1094323 got a SR

And https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/766399 should make various
doxygen docs reproducible again (alsa, fltk, hwinfo).



I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200127/ today
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 12569 (+11)
build-tried: 12560 (+10)
build-failed: 37 (-12)
build-n-a: 82 (+3)
build-succeeded: 12441 (+19)
build-official-failed+na: 120 (+20)

build-compare-failed: 393 (+13)
build-compare-succeeded: 12048 (+6)

verify-failed: 543 (-7)
verified-semi-reproducible: 11671 (-85)
verified-bit-identical: 0 (+0)

bit-by-bit-identical: 11665 (+3)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 773 (+16)


https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200127/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200127/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
2 were in ring0
45 were in ring1

That makes it 47/2901 => 1.62 %
which is below the overall average of
393/12441 => 3.16 %

773/12441 => 6.21 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible


Ciao
Bernhard M.

< Previous Next >
This Thread
  • No further messages