As far as I can see, 1) no one submit delete request against libopensync, but the rest of libopensync related packages were deleted. 2) libopensync actually can not safety dropped from Factory as kdepim3 is build require with it, and kitchensync is rely on it as well, perhaps that is the reason why no one trying to drop it from Factory. On the other hand, Leap does not have KDE3, and even Leap doesn't have any package requires libopensync, so no libopensync in Leap should not sounds strange.
That looks like a loop, as it appears that KDE3 is not in Leap because there are missing packages :-)
On can build kdepim3 with reduced functionality without this library. But I was just wonderingwhat target should I consider more important, Leap or Factory? Also the difference of Leap from Factory was totally surprising to me. Prevuously if packages were building/working in Factory they would work in openSUSE release. But this time all looked will till the very end when it turned out that in Leap one even cannot install kdebase3 on Leap because it was using udisks-glue for automounting and that was absent from Leap but still in place in Factory. This problem is of course avoidable (I made the dependency soft, without udisks-glue the media will mount upon clicking the disk's icon) but it was unexpected. I wonder how one can now track compatibility of packages with the upcoming release if they are so different from Factory? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org