On 5 August 2015 at 14:21, Mike Galbraith
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 12:07 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Wednesday 2015-08-05 11:59, Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
Why is everybody expecting 0 breakage at 0 work investment?
TW must have looked differently to people when Greg ran the process. I somehow share that feeling, given the Greg-TW seemed hand-picked, and included reverts. The current TW on the other hand seems just like Factory with a bit of OpenQA thrown in, and you won't see any reverts in the automated Nussel mails.
Yeah, that's it in a nutshell. Greg advertised a rolling stable, which I found very attractive, why I gave it a trial run, loved it, and kept it. I don't blame TW folks for taking it closer to bleeding edge, but the fact remains that I then had to extract its teeth from my backside.
-Mike
Mike, if you invested the same time into bug reports for TW (the filing thereof, or maybe even the solving thereof) I assure you, TW would be less likely to bite you or anyone else in the backside The TW development process works, but it really benefits exponentially from people who a) File bug reports b) File new openQA test cases to avoid future bug reports c) Fix bugs Your quoted post above does not fall into either a), b), or c), and the time spent by either of us on these emails so far has taken longer than a) or b) would have Think about it.. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org