On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Marguerite Su wrote:
a. IBus is at first an Input Method Framework across all platform, then something to be integrated into Gnome.
That's why it can't be and will never be GBus. because IBus has to support every platform.
b. He said "every IMF die one day or another, Gnome lives long". That self-explains why any IMF itself can't be a standard.
And he still can ask: why not GBus? I think GFcitx is good. Thank you very much for your explanation. Based on what I said, what I want is that GNOME project maintains an IMF. So the IMF can live longer. AFAIK, GNOME project do not prevent its components being run on other DE/WM/OS. So the IMF can still support other platforms.
The reality is not exactly what I want. So I just joined ibus project.
1. He is always asking questions without any proof but simply in an opposite way in a technical discussion. 2. Statistical data in DDL ML shows he will certainly reply every email I sent by simply asking questions in the opposite way but didn't provide any proof. Even not to him directly. He's willing me to quarrel with him to make myself a troll or rule breaker. I can understand that some people would object GNOME's ibus integration. I generally reply to all posts that are weak in logic. Beyond whether GNOME should integrate an IMF, what I care is that whether CJK users can communicate with upstream projects effectively. Sentimental posts prohibits discussion and communication.
3. He flooded on every post in my personal blog. Even dairies and non IMF/openSUSE/FOSS topics. AFAIK, I only reply to FOSS related posts. And I never use any offensive words. For example, I said "Congratulations" after seeing you become a openSUSE member. Can you show me a link of non-FOSS related "dairy"?
4. Evidences in DDL shows he knew nothing about IMF but trying to make point on IMF topics. That's great misleading to all parts. Such attitude is what I feel really bad. It prohibits discussion.
5. He's following me from list to list. I join DDL to support IMF integration. I join this list to object complete dropping of SCIM and ibus. Since they are both active. I reply to you because you are doing what I feel wrong.
If you really want to prove I was personally attacking you. I suggest you translate them all. I had enough of your pretending innocence. Actually you already acknowledge you're personal attacking in your May 16's blog post. (寫到這裏,有人警告我說不要再寫了,不然你名聲都壞完了。我這人在你們的世界中存在嗎?所以談這個有必要嗎?快意恩仇就好。有人說不要跟傻逼一般見識,不,你越不一般見識,傻逼越來越多,就好比你越不清理垃圾評論,垃圾評論就會越來越多一樣,治理傻逼,從我做起,從小事做起。
我知道你們一般人都不會在這種明顯人身攻擊的文章上回覆的,但心裏一定特別爽。我這人寫文沒別的特點,就是通感特別強。保證感同身受的爽死你們。) The above paragraphs clearly show that you feel right doing personal attack. That's what I object.
I think it's enough to clear my name. I'm always talking about procedure and the way to do things in FOSS world. I respect your contributions as much as the next man.
Best Regards, Ma Xiaojun