-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jiri Srain wrote: ...
Do we want to call these packages -doc? It may be confusing, one may expect the end-user documentation in these packages, but what he finds is (mostly) the autogenerated documentation targeted for developers.
We already have eg. the yast2-devel package which contains only documentation for developers. I'd find it consistent calling the packages this way (eg. yast2-installatoin-devel in thexample above).
I checked with local packagers, there is no rule on how such packages should be caleld. There are already some -devel-doc packages in autobuild, but they are just about five.
Any other ideas?
- -devel-doc sounds straightforward and sane to me.
cheers
- --
-o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
/\\