On Monday 09 of September 2013 16:32:52 Johannes Obermayr wrote:
Do you guys actually read what I am writing and referring to or do you only see a big SR and patch?
Again the key fixes and improvements:
First, that kind of mention in changelog would be a big step towards accepting it IMO, since reviewing a 4MB patch with almost only argumenting "builds faster!" is not easy, and one is much closer to decline such SR.
- bnc#833714 (OSMesa symbols)
- bnc#807205,rh#917687 (issue with already applied patch)
- Readd lost things to the follow-up patch, possibly lost due to merge
conflicts - Drop obsolete patches which could mess up things
ok, but i guess it would be good to test "does it mess up things" (also one of reasons why this is a bit hard to get in so late in the game.
- fdo#64810 (EGL runtime issue), could be also bnc#839074
Can't reproduce, and isn't bnc#839074
- ~ 1/2 build time
- ~ 1/5 - 1/6 binaries and -debuginfo
Always good ;-)
Is the only reason you don't want them fixed in 13.1 because they require 22 patches and upstream core devs don't want to talk to me anymore. Maybe they change their mind if one of the big distribution ships them ...
Maybe, but i'm not fond of openSUSE being testing ground for random, huge, not-upstream-ed/-eable patches...