Re: [opensuse] DHCPv6-PD request
Any chance of getting an updated dhcpcd for 13.1, instead of having to roll my own? tnx jk On 04/19/2016 10:35 AM, Jeremy Baker wrote:
On 04/18/2016 10:30 PM, James Knott wrote:
My ISP is finally rolling out IPv6. One thing that's required is for the router to make a DHCPv6-PD request to get the prefix info etc. I don't know if my router/firewall, based on openSUSE 13.1 is doing that. I don't see anything in Wireshark that would indicate it's making that sort of request. I'm also not aware of any configuration that would enable it. Does anyone know anything about this?
tnx jk
dhcpcd after 6.4.0 will request and disposition a ia-pd prefix. I'm not sure what version 13.1 has, but opensuse 13.2 only has version 3.2.3. I installed dhcpcd-6.10.1 from source on leap and have been using it to get a delegation from my isp for 3 months or so.
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
James Knott wrote:
Any chance of getting an updated dhcpcd for 13.1, instead of having to roll my own?
tnx jk
Try http://software.opensuse.org/ - somebody might have already built it for 13.1. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (4.4°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - dedicated server rental in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Per Jessen wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Any chance of getting an updated dhcpcd for 13.1, instead of having to roll my own?
tnx jk
Try http://software.opensuse.org/ - somebody might have already built it for 13.1.
Yep, looks like somebody did. Check it out. At first I was surprised that this sort of issue should only be surfacing now, but I guess most people will have been relying on the router/modem to do the dhcpv6 stuff for themn. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (4.9°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2016-04-20 07:52, Per Jessen wrote:
At first I was surprised that this sort of issue should only be surfacing now, but I guess most people will have been relying on the router/modem to do the dhcpv6 stuff for themn.
That, and that most people are not getting IPv6 (yet) from our providers. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
On 04/20/2016 06:48 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
That, and that most people are not getting IPv6 (yet) from our providers.
It's coming. For example, Comcast, in the U.S. has been providing IPv6 for a couple of years now. Telus, in Canada announced it a few months back. My own ISP, Rogers, has had 6rd and 6to4 tunnels for a couple of years and is now rolling out native IPv6. I have been using a 6in4 tunnel for about 6 years. Compared to many other parts of the world, Canada is already well behind the times with this. For example, many of the sites such as Google, Yahoo, Cisco, Youtube, Wikipedia, U.S. government and many others have been IPv6 for years. Even www.opensuse.org was, but for some reason dropped it a while ago. So, yes, IPv6 is something that has to be prepared for. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2016-04-20 13:19, James Knott wrote:
On 04/20/2016 06:48 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
That, and that most people are not getting IPv6 (yet) from our providers.
It's coming. [...] So, yes, IPv6 is something that has to be prepared for.
But my ISP does not give it to home clients, as far as I know. I heard a rumour that you can request (and pay) for it. Another rumour says that they are betatesting it. The only improvement is that the routers they issue now are prepared for it. Searching for information about this, it turns out that when the article (I was just reading) was written (2014), the government tax site had two IPv4 addresses and one IPv6 address: ****.1.cdn.telefonica.com has IPv6 address :: Ie, localhost. Apparently, Linux has a preference to IPv6 when available, so the connection for people using IPv6 and Linux, failed. LOL. (http://www.linuxtecnico.es/2014/06/telefonica-no-sabe-de-ipv6.html) The article also comments something very interesting for "bind": filter-aaaa-on-v4 yes; which is the solution to something I asked for time ago, I think. I have to try it. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-04-20 13:19, James Knott wrote:
On 04/20/2016 06:48 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
That, and that most people are not getting IPv6 (yet) from our providers.
It's coming. [...] So, yes, IPv6 is something that has to be prepared for.
But my ISP does not give it to home clients, as far as I know.
If you want to be ahead of the masses and your ISP, set up a tunnel and learn the ropes with that. I set up my first tunnel in 2006, then got my own range in 2009. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (14.8°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/20/2016 08:29 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
If you want to be ahead of the masses and your ISP, set up a tunnel and learn the ropes with that. I set up my first tunnel in 2006, then got my own range in 2009.
I obtained a /56 prefix, via 6in4 tunnel about 6 years ago. However, it appears that service may be shutting down in the not to distant future. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2016-04-20 14:29, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-04-20 13:19, James Knott wrote:
On 04/20/2016 06:48 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
That, and that most people are not getting IPv6 (yet) from our providers.
It's coming. [...] So, yes, IPv6 is something that has to be prepared for.
But my ISP does not give it to home clients, as far as I know.
If you want to be ahead of the masses and your ISP, set up a tunnel and learn the ropes with that. I set up my first tunnel in 2006, then got my own range in 2009.
No, I prefer to wait. I don't see the advantage. I'd perhaps try if it were my ISP which provided the tunnel. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-04-20 14:29, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-04-20 13:19, James Knott wrote:
On 04/20/2016 06:48 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
That, and that most people are not getting IPv6 (yet) from our providers.
It's coming. [...] So, yes, IPv6 is something that has to be prepared for.
But my ISP does not give it to home clients, as far as I know.
If you want to be ahead of the masses and your ISP, set up a tunnel and learn the ropes with that. I set up my first tunnel in 2006, then got my own range in 2009.
No, I prefer to wait. I don't see the advantage.
The advantage of learning? Well, it has to be for fun, of course.
I'd perhaps try if it were my ISP which provided the tunnel.
I don't see the difference, but maybe that's my awkward look at the world :-) -- Per Jessen, Zürich (16.5°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - virtual servers, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-04-20 15:40, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
If you want to be ahead of the masses and your ISP, set up a tunnel and learn the ropes with that. I set up my first tunnel in 2006, then got my own range in 2009.
No, I prefer to wait. I don't see the advantage.
The advantage of learning? Well, it has to be for fun, of course.
Ah, that. The advantage of learning, yes. Right, true. I was thinking of other, tangible, advantages. :-}
I'd perhaps try if it were my ISP which provided the tunnel.
I don't see the difference, but maybe that's my awkward look at the world :-)
:-) - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" (Minas Tirith)) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlcX0AwACgkQja8UbcUWM1x4XAD/TFxnId/Vs0JcM5EIAoTin+mU XIr7g6rBlNSLmlHAj98A/3f72u277gJrbbitmfRR1bnunvvoE1H3lfz11DG0hCv5 =zndo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Carlos E. R. wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 2016-04-20 15:40, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
If you want to be ahead of the masses and your ISP, set up a tunnel and learn the ropes with that. I set up my first tunnel in 2006, then got my own range in 2009.
No, I prefer to wait. I don't see the advantage.
The advantage of learning? Well, it has to be for fun, of course.
Ah, that. The advantage of learning, yes. Right, true. I was thinking of other, tangible, advantages. :-}
For Joe Bloggs and his grandmum, there will probably never be any real, tangible advantage. It doesn't matter whether you're watching telly over ipv4 or ipv6. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (7.8°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - virtual servers, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/21/2016 02:24 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Ah, that. The advantage of learning, yes. Right, true. I was thinking
of other, tangible, advantages. :-} For Joe Bloggs and his grandmum, there will probably never be any real, tangible advantage. It doesn't matter whether you're watching telly over ipv4 or ipv6.
Well, there's the Internet of Things (IoT) coming, where there'll be all sorts of devices coming, each requiring an IP address. IoT simply can't be accommodated on IPv4. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
James Knott wrote:
On 04/21/2016 02:24 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Ah, that. The advantage of learning, yes. Right, true. I was thinking
of other, tangible, advantages. :-} For Joe Bloggs and his grandmum, there will probably never be any real, tangible advantage. It doesn't matter whether you're watching telly over ipv4 or ipv6.
Well, there's the Internet of Things (IoT) coming, where there'll be all sorts of devices coming, each requiring an IP address. IoT simply can't be accommodated on IPv4.
Sure, but I doubt if Joe Bloggs and his grandmum care much about IoT. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (16.1°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - virtual servers, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2016-04-21 13:49, Per Jessen wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Well, there's the Internet of Things (IoT) coming, where there'll be all sorts of devices coming, each requiring an IP address. IoT simply can't be accommodated on IPv4.
Sure, but I doubt if Joe Bloggs and his grandmum care much about IoT.
They will care about controlling the house heating from their android phone. And they will wonder that they get hacked, but they won't know it :-p -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
On 04/20/2016 09:27 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
No, I prefer to wait. I don't see the advantage. I'd perhaps try if it were my ISP which provided the tunnel.
The advantage is you can get IPv6 without having to wait for your ISP. As I mentioned, I've been running IPv6 via tunnel for almost 6 years, but my ISP is only now rolling it out. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2016-04-21 00:57, James Knott wrote:
On 04/20/2016 09:27 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
No, I prefer to wait. I don't see the advantage. I'd perhaps try if it were my ISP which provided the tunnel.
The advantage is you can get IPv6 without having to wait for your ISP. As I mentioned, I've been running IPv6 via tunnel for almost 6 years, but my ISP is only now rolling it out.
Yes, but besides learning, I do not see an advantage with Ipv6. Well, perhaps one: maybe it is a fixed IP, and in that case, I can use that one easily to tell some friends how to connect to one of my computers. Probably without redirecting a port on the router - just opening its firewall, perhaps. I doubt of the router abilities there. I forgot: my friends also will need IPv6, and some do not even know where is the router! Even less if they have IPv6. I have searched a bit, and located more links about my provider, dated 2012 and a bit later, saying that they were going to try IPv6 on 1% of their users. I have not found recent information, not what resulted from the tests. Not promising. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
On 04/21/2016 04:40 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Yes, but besides learning, I do not see an advantage with Ipv6. Well, perhaps one: maybe it is a fixed IP, and in that case, I can use that one easily to tell some friends how to connect to one of my computers.
Well, you get lots of addresses. I have a /56 prefix, which is 2^72 addresses or about a trillion times the entire IPv4 address space. There are also many sites around the world that are IPv6 only, as there aren't any IPv4 addresses available for them. There are also a lot of technical changes that make it better. While the average user might not notice them, they improve performance. One example is the fixed length headers & extension headers, instead of the variable length headers in IPv4. This makes the router's job easier. There are many more, where the designer looked at what worked well and what didn't in IPv4. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/20/2016 07:35 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 04/20/2016 06:48 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
That, and that most people are not getting IPv6 (yet) from our providers. It's coming. [...] So, yes, IPv6 is something that has to be prepared for. But my ISP does not give it to home clients, as far as I know. I heard a rumour that you can request (and pay) for it. Another rumour says that
On 2016-04-20 13:19, James Knott wrote: they are betatesting it.
That must be another one of those Spain things. ;-)
The only improvement is that the routers they issue now are prepared for it.
Searching for information about this, it turns out that when the article (I was just reading) was written (2014), the government tax site had two IPv4 addresses and one IPv6 address:
I don't know if the Canadian government has any IPv6 sites but, as I mentioned, the U.S. government has for years. According to what I've read, the U.S. and Switzerland are more or less tied for being the most advanced in IPv6 deployment. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
James Knott wrote:
On 04/20/2016 07:35 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-04-20 13:19, James Knott wrote:
On 04/20/2016 06:48 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
That, and that most people are not getting IPv6 (yet) from our providers. It's coming. [...] So, yes, IPv6 is something that has to be prepared for. But my ISP does not give it to home clients, as far as I know. I heard a rumour that you can request (and pay) for it. Another rumour says that they are betatesting it.
That must be another one of those Spain things. ;-)
Maybe it's something in the water supply :-) -- Per Jessen, Zürich (15.1°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2016-04-20 14:30, James Knott wrote:
On 04/20/2016 07:35 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 04/20/2016 06:48 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
That, and that most people are not getting IPv6 (yet) from our providers. It's coming. [...] So, yes, IPv6 is something that has to be prepared for. But my ISP does not give it to home clients, as far as I know. I heard a rumour that you can request (and pay) for it. Another rumour says that
On 2016-04-20 13:19, James Knott wrote: they are betatesting it.
That must be another one of those Spain things. ;-)
:-) Maybe, because that same provider I see in the web that uses IPv6 in South America. Maybe because there are fewer IP addresses free there. Dunno.
The only improvement is that the routers they issue now are prepared for it.
Searching for information about this, it turns out that when the article (I was just reading) was written (2014), the government tax site had two IPv4 addresses and one IPv6 address:
I don't know if the Canadian government has any IPv6 sites but, as I mentioned, the U.S. government has for years. According to what I've read, the U.S. and Switzerland are more or less tied for being the most advanced in IPv6 deployment.
Actually, they did not have IPv6 (it was "localhost"). The article accuses the ISP of using people in training to badly setup the DNS. People in training (becarios) are a way to pay less to professionals. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
James Knott wrote:
On 04/20/2016 06:48 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
That, and that most people are not getting IPv6 (yet) from our providers.
It's coming. For example, Comcast, in the U.S. has been providing IPv6 for a couple of years now. Telus, in Canada announced it a few months back.
I see IPv6 hits on our hosted websites every day, a lot more than a few years back. According to the google stats: http://www.google.ch/ipv6/statistics.html some 10% of clients are IPv6. The per-country tab shows big variations from country to country. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (14.6°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - free dynamic DNS, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-04-20 07:52, Per Jessen wrote:
At first I was surprised that this sort of issue should only be surfacing now, but I guess most people will have been relying on the router/modem to do the dhcpv6 stuff for themn.
That, and that most people are not getting IPv6 (yet) from our providers.
"most" maybe not, but many might. It depends a lot on your location. I would just have expected that there would be enough people, in particular those on Linux, and that some would have encountered this issue by now. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (14.1°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/20/2016 01:52 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
At first I was surprised that this sort of issue should only be surfacing now, but I guess most people will have been relying on the router/modem to do the dhcpv6 stuff for themn.
My router/firewall is a computer running openSUSE 13.1 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
James Knott wrote:
On 04/20/2016 01:52 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
At first I was surprised that this sort of issue should only be surfacing now, but I guess most people will have been relying on the router/modem to do the dhcpv6 stuff for themn.
My router/firewall is a computer running openSUSE 13.1
Yep, that's what I understood too. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (14.7°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - dedicated server rental in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/20/2016 01:46 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Any chance of getting an updated dhcpcd for 13.1, instead of having to roll my own?
tnx jk Try http://software.opensuse.org/ - somebody might have already built it for 13.1.
When I go there and search on dhcpcd, it only lists 3.2.3. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/21/2016 05:24 PM, James Knott wrote:
On 04/20/2016 01:46 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Any chance of getting an updated dhcpcd for 13.1, instead of having to roll my own?
tnx jk Try http://software.opensuse.org/ - somebody might have already built it for 13.1.
When I go there and search on dhcpcd, it only lists 3.2.3.
Correction, I found 6.10.1under Leap 42.1 unstable. Can that be installed on 13.1? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
James Knott wrote:
On 04/21/2016 05:24 PM, James Knott wrote:
On 04/20/2016 01:46 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Any chance of getting an updated dhcpcd for 13.1, instead of having to roll my own?
tnx jk Try http://software.opensuse.org/ - somebody might have already built it for 13.1.
When I go there and search on dhcpcd, it only lists 3.2.3.
Correction, I found 6.10.1under Leap 42.1 unstable. Can that be installed on 13.1?
I see it for 13.1 here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?project=home%3Abastianfriedrich&package=dhcpcd If the leap421 version install - just download and try it with "rpm --test --install ..." -- Per Jessen, Zürich (14.0°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - virtual servers, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/22/2016 03:24 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
I see it for 13.1 here:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?project=home%3Abastianfriedrich&package=dhcpcd
If the leap421 version install - just download and try it with "rpm --test --install ..."
I get: # rpm --test --install dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm warning: dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID c354de79: NOKEY file /usr/sbin/dhcpcd from install of dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dhcpcd-3.2.3-47.78.1.2.x86_64 file /usr/share/doc/packages/dhcpcd/README from install of dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dhcpcd-3.2.3-47.78.1.2.x86_64 file /usr/share/man/man8/dhcpcd.8.gz from install of dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dhcpcd-3.2.3-47.78.1.2.x86_64 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
23.04.2016 05:18, James Knott пишет:
On 04/22/2016 03:24 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
I see it for 13.1 here:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?project=home%3Abastianfriedrich&package=dhcpcd
If the leap421 version install - just download and try it with "rpm --test --install ..."
I get:
# rpm --test --install dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm
You need --upgrade or --freshen, not --install.
warning: dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID c354de79: NOKEY file /usr/sbin/dhcpcd from install of dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dhcpcd-3.2.3-47.78.1.2.x86_64 file /usr/share/doc/packages/dhcpcd/README from install of dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dhcpcd-3.2.3-47.78.1.2.x86_64 file /usr/share/man/man8/dhcpcd.8.gz from install of dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dhcpcd-3.2.3-47.78.1.2.x86_64
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/23/2016 02:18 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
# rpm --test --install dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm You need --upgrade or --freshen, not --install.
warning: dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID c354de79: NOKEY
I still get that NOKEY warning. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
James Knott wrote:
On 04/23/2016 02:18 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
# rpm --test --install dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm You need --upgrade or --freshen, not --install.
warning: dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID c354de79: NOKEY
I still get that NOKEY warning.
Most probably because the package is coming from a user repo. I wouldn't worry about it. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (12.0°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/23/2016 10:04 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
James Knott wrote:
On 04/23/2016 02:18 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
# rpm --test --install dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm You need --upgrade or --freshen, not --install.
warning: dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID c354de79: NOKEY I still get that NOKEY warning. Most probably because the package is coming from a user repo. I wouldn't worry about it.
It killed dhcp entirely. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/23/2016 10:04 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
James Knott wrote:
On 04/23/2016 02:18 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
# rpm --test --install dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm You need --upgrade or --freshen, not --install.
warning: dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID c354de79: NOKEY I still get that NOKEY warning. Most probably because the package is coming from a user repo. I wouldn't worry about it.
If I install the current Leap, will I get that version? I normally run the Evergreen versions, with the latest being 13.1. Will there be an Evergreen Leap? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
James Knott wrote:
On 04/23/2016 10:04 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
James Knott wrote:
On 04/23/2016 02:18 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
# rpm --test --install dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm You need --upgrade or --freshen, not --install.
warning: dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID c354de79: NOKEY I still get that NOKEY warning. Most probably because the package is coming from a user repo. I wouldn't worry about it.
If I install the current Leap, will I get that version?
No, with Leap you're using wicked as the dhcp client. I would hope wicked has support for PD.
I normally run the Evergreen versions, with the latest being 13.1. Will there be an Evergreen Leap?
Leap is supposed to be a longer-support version itself, I'm not sure what the current status is. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (9.8°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - virtual servers, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2016-04-23 18:27, Per Jessen wrote:
I normally run the Evergreen versions, with the latest being 13.1. Will there be an Evergreen Leap?
Leap is supposed to be a longer-support version itself, I'm not sure what the current status is.
I think the idea is to do something similar to service packs, but that would apply to the SLE core. The kernel is not part of it. And many packages came from tumbleweed, so... I think it means updating to 42.2 soon, somehow. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Carlos E. R. <robin.listas@telefonica.net> wrote:
On 2016-04-23 18:27, Per Jessen wrote:
I normally run the Evergreen versions, with the latest being 13.1. Will there be an Evergreen Leap?
Leap is supposed to be a longer-support version itself, I'm not sure what the current status is.
I think the idea is to do something similar to service packs, but that would apply to the SLE core. The kernel is not part of it. And many packages came from tumbleweed, so... I think it means updating to 42.2 soon, somehow.
100% agreed. There is a plan, but a big part of the plan is flexibility. Certainly Leap 42 (vs. 42.1) will be supported until SLES 13 comes out (a few years?). Leap at its core is tied to SLES. SLES 12 SP2 is in the offing, so Leap 42.2 won't be far behind. http://opensuse.markmail.org/thread/nr3aczhig5ofb35r Next month (May) a set of SP2 beta packages is supposed to be in OBS. The first alpha release of Leap 42.2 is targeted for the end of May. Over the following few months a decision has to be made for each and every update that is in SLES 12 SP2: Do we submit the same update to Leap 42.2? Or do we get an even newer version out of factory (tumbleweed)? If the 42.1 package came from factory/tumbleweed, then I assume that in general the Leap 42.2 package will be updated to the latest tumbleweed version. If the 42.1 package came from SLE 12, then the odds are high the SP2 update will be used for that package. Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/23/2016 12:27 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
Leap is supposed to be a longer-support version itself, I'm not sure what the current status is.
Is there a live version of Leap available? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-04-23 22:49, James Knott wrote:
On 04/23/2016 12:27 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
Leap is supposed to be a longer-support version itself, I'm not sure what the current status is.
Is there a live version of Leap available?
Not that I know. - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" (Minas Tirith)) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlcb/3sACgkQja8UbcUWM1wrGwD5AYraQjqmMy17bhWkvn56q1CH vsXcWUbPV1GGObLqz6EA/1BjUzBaWOhtfBhkvRvznn740wfGyZNvpLkduaiTZVT6 =uVAP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Is there a live version of Leap available? there are lot of them, but not "official" but coming from Studio :-) jdd -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/23/2016 12:27 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
James Knott wrote:
On 04/23/2016 10:04 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
James Knott wrote:
On 04/23/2016 02:18 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
# rpm --test --install dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm You need --upgrade or --freshen, not --install.
> warning: dhcpcd-6.10.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 > Signature, key ID c354de79: NOKEY I still get that NOKEY warning. Most probably because the package is coming from a user repo. I wouldn't worry about it.
If I install the current Leap, will I get that version? No, with Leap you're using wicked as the dhcp client. I would hope wicked has support for PD. If there is support for PD in wicked, I wasn't able to find it. The reason I went with leap was because it didn't have dhcpcd installed, so I didn't have to worry about breaking anything by installing it.
I normally run the Evergreen versions, with the latest being 13.1. Will there be an Evergreen Leap? Leap is supposed to be a longer-support version itself, I'm not sure what the current status is.
-- Jeremy Baker <jab@mbcs.ca> GnuPGP fingerprint = EE66 AC49 E008 E09A 7A2A 0195 50EF 580B EDBB 95B6 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/24/2016 08:36 AM, Jeremy Baker wrote:
If there is support for PD in wicked, I wasn't able to find it. The reason I went with leap was because it didn't have dhcpcd installed, so I didn't have to worry about breaking anything by installing it.
Who should be contacted about this? Lack of DHCPv6-PD is a serious flaw. I suppose I could install LEAP and dhcpc on my firewall, but I'd do a full backup of my current system first. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/24/2016 09:34 AM, James Knott wrote:
On 04/24/2016 08:36 AM, Jeremy Baker wrote:
If there is support for PD in wicked, I wasn't able to find it. The reason I went with leap was because it didn't have dhcpcd installed, so I didn't have to worry about breaking anything by installing it.
Who should be contacted about this? Lack of DHCPv6-PD is a serious flaw. I suppose I could install LEAP and dhcpc on my firewall, but I'd do a full backup of my current system first.
I have filed a report in Bugzilla. https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=976956 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
participants (7)
-
Andrei Borzenkov -
Carlos E. R. -
Greg Freemyer -
James Knott -
jdd -
Jeremy Baker -
Per Jessen