Re: [opensuse] Paying with the "future": Btrfs Grub2, systemd
On Sunday 27 January 2013, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 27/01/13 14:53, Anton Aylward escribió:
The partitioner complained that I should have a
separate /boot that was ext3 or ext4.
That's a bug in the partitioner that I have also seen.
I do have some reservations. Classically there have been good reasons for partitioning. I recall one vulnerability that arise if /tmp was on the same fs as the root. Good reason to have a /tmp that is nosetuid, possibly even noexec.
Daemons using /tmp should be already using systemd's PrivateTemp feature that renders this kind of bugs moot.
- daemon start, a new filesystem namespace is created with separate /tmp per process group. - if daemon dies, crashes or is stopped the task goes "out of scope" and the files it created there are deleted.
What does "new filesystem namespace" mean? A different file system for each daemon or just different directories on the same file system? cu, Rudi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
participants (1)
-
Ruediger Meier