[opensuse] SpiderOak has dropped openSUSE
SpiderOak no longer maintains openSUSE packages. Just dissappeared from repo in last hour. Last rpm was SpiderOak-9948-1.x86_64 Thu 11 Oct 2012 01:46:20 PM EDT -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Il 20/02/2014 18:43, Patrick Shanahan ha scritto:
SpiderOak no longer maintains openSUSE packages. Just dissappeared from repo in last hour. Last rpm was SpiderOak-9948-1.x86_64 Thu 11 Oct 2012 01:46:20 PM EDT
You can successfully use the Fedora based RPM available in SpiderOak site. Cheers, -- Marco Calistri (amdturion) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Il 20/02/2014 19:15, Marco Calistri ha scritto:
Il 20/02/2014 18:43, Patrick Shanahan ha scritto:
SpiderOak no longer maintains openSUSE packages. Just dissappeared from repo in last hour. Last rpm was SpiderOak-9948-1.x86_64 Thu 11 Oct 2012 01:46:20 PM EDT
You can successfully use the Fedora based RPM available in SpiderOak site.
Cheers,
Tried to install latest 64 bit rpm and get this error: Recupero di pacchetto SpiderOak-1:5.1.3-1.x86_64 (1/1), 21,9 MiB (estratto 62,4 MiB) (1/1) Installazione di: SpiderOak-1:5.1.3-1 .............................[fatto] Output aggiuntivo di rpm: warning: /var/cache/zypp/packages/_tmpRPMcache_/SpiderOak-5.1.3-1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 87271cbf: NOKEY process 2412: arguments to dbus_validate_bus_name() were incorrect, assertion "name != NULL" failed in file dbus-syntax.c line 248. This is normally a bug in some application using the D-Bus library. D-Bus not built with -rdynamic so unable to print a backtrace /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Y8d6pu: line 2: 2412 Aborted /bin/dbus-send --system /com/spideroak/updater com.spideroak.client.updated string:5.1.3 warning: %post(SpiderOak-1:5.1.3-1.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 134 Please devs, try to correct the DBUS issue! Cheers, -- Marco Calistri opensuse 13.1 (Bottle) 64 bit - Kernel 3.11.10-7-default Gnome 3.10.1 Intel® Core™ i5-2410M CPU @ 2.30GHz × 4 - Intel® Sandybridge Mobile -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Il 22/02/2014 13:30, Marco Calistri ha scritto:
Il 20/02/2014 19:15, Marco Calistri ha scritto:
Il 20/02/2014 18:43, Patrick Shanahan ha scritto:
SpiderOak no longer maintains openSUSE packages. Just dissappeared from repo in last hour. Last rpm was SpiderOak-9948-1.x86_64 Thu 11 Oct 2012 01:46:20 PM EDT
You can successfully use the Fedora based RPM available in SpiderOak site.
Cheers,
Tried to install latest 64 bit rpm and get this error:
Recupero di pacchetto SpiderOak-1:5.1.3-1.x86_64 (1/1), 21,9 MiB (estratto 62,4 MiB) (1/1) Installazione di: SpiderOak-1:5.1.3-1 .............................[fatto] Output aggiuntivo di rpm: warning: /var/cache/zypp/packages/_tmpRPMcache_/SpiderOak-5.1.3-1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 87271cbf: NOKEY process 2412: arguments to dbus_validate_bus_name() were incorrect, assertion "name != NULL" failed in file dbus-syntax.c line 248. This is normally a bug in some application using the D-Bus library. D-Bus not built with -rdynamic so unable to print a backtrace /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Y8d6pu: line 2: 2412 Aborted /bin/dbus-send --system /com/spideroak/updater com.spideroak.client.updated string:5.1.3 warning: %post(SpiderOak-1:5.1.3-1.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 134
Please devs, try to correct the DBUS issue!
Cheers,
Not a critical issue however! Just reboot the system and SpiderOak will run perfectly :-) Regards, -- Marco Calistri opensuse 13.1 (Bottle) 64 bit - Kernel 3.11.10-7-default Gnome 3.10.1 Intel® Core™ i5-2410M CPU @ 2.30GHz × 4 - Intel® Sandybridge Mobile -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2/20/2014 1:43 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
SpiderOak no longer maintains openSUSE packages. Just dissappeared from repo in last hour. Last rpm was SpiderOak-9948-1.x86_64 Thu 11 Oct 2012 01:46:20 PM EDT
I never knew they has a repository, I always just downloaded the RPM from their site, and installed it directly. Theoretically, this is smarter anyway for a security oriented package like Spideroak. You want to know about every time it updates and not get blind sided by an update that breaks something. I noticed they stopped mentioning Opensuse on their web page, but upon downloading the RetHat rpm it installed perfectly. -- _____________________________________ ---This space for rent--- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
* John Andersen
On 2/20/2014 1:43 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
SpiderOak no longer maintains openSUSE packages. Just dissappeared from repo in last hour. Last rpm was SpiderOak-9948-1.x86_64 Thu 11 Oct 2012 01:46:20 PM EDT
I never knew they has a repository, I always just downloaded the RPM from their site, and installed it directly.
Theoretically, this is smarter anyway for a security oriented package like Spideroak. You want to know about every time it updates and not get blind sided by an update that breaks something.
I noticed they stopped mentioning Opensuse on their web page, but upon downloading the RetHat rpm it installed perfectly.
They blew a lot of heavy smoke when they first offered ?free? space and openSUSE support, but google ends up cheaper and just as easy.... windoz now offers a free 7gb, as usual, last one to the trough. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2/20/2014 3:40 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
They blew a lot of heavy smoke when they first offered ?free? space and openSUSE support, but google ends up cheaper and just as easy....
windoz now offers a free 7gb, as usual, last one to the trough.
But those (dropbox, Onedrive, Box, and GoogleDrive) aren't even in the same market as SpiderOak. The others all tell you right up front that they will give your content to any authority that asks. Spideroak just tell Law Enforcement you can't get content from us. https://spideroak.com/law_enforcement/ Spideroak is focused on two different fronts, Sync, and Backups, including version history. (They have sharing as well, but I haven't used that much, nor do I sync with it). I mostly use the Backup, backing up two different machines (one Linux, one Windows) with versions so I can step back in time on any file to see older versions. Most software development files. So slightly different market segments. Here is a recent pricing matrix for the big four http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-3513_7-57618942/onedrive-dropbox-google-drive-a... The clear winner on Price points is Google Drive. I have all of them. The winner on integration (IMHO) is OneDrive (skydrive) as it integrates directly into the file system of Windows 8.1 without any additional installed things running on your machine. That said, there's a limit to just how closely I want stuff integrating into my Linux machines. I don't like the restrictions Google Drive, it seems overly focused on capturing your documents into google doc formats, which suits some people, but not me. -- _____________________________________ ---This space for rent--- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:44 PM, John Andersen
I noticed they stopped mentioning Opensuse on their web page, but upon downloading the RetHat rpm it installed perfectly.
I too use the RedHat rpm. I'm doing so with opensuse 13.1 Greg -- Greg Freemyer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
SpiderOak no longer maintains openSUSE packages. Just dissappeared from repo in last hour. Last rpm was SpiderOak-9948-1.x86_64 Thu 11 Oct 2012 01:46:20 PM EDT
This isn't really new is it? I thought SpiderOak stopped building openSUSE RPMs back in 2012. I remember this from Google+: https://plus.google.com/118182144522076820414/posts/huwnFyu31zP Plus... the "last RPM" you listed is dated 11 Oct 2012? There have been several releases since Oct 2012, including a branding fix for SpiderOak on openSUSE in June of 2013. The repo version you were using (or at least referencing) looks to be a REALLY old release anyway. C. -- openSUSE 13.1 x86_64, KDE 4.12 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Friday, February 21, 2014 06:38:31 AM C wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
SpiderOak no longer maintains openSUSE packages. Just dissappeared from repo in last hour. Last rpm was
SpiderOak-9948-1.x86_64 Thu 11 Oct 2012 01:46:20 PM EDT
This isn't really new is it? I thought SpiderOak stopped building openSUSE RPMs back in 2012. I remember this from Google+: https://plus.google.com/118182144522076820414/posts/huwnFyu31zP
Plus... the "last RPM" you listed is dated 11 Oct 2012? There have been several releases since Oct 2012, including a branding fix for SpiderOak on openSUSE in June of 2013. The repo version you were using (or at least referencing) looks to be a REALLY old release anyway.
C.
I still remember SpiderOak started on openSUSE 11.3 with a lot of whistle and bells. IIRC, That was a launching startup marketing on Linux (openSUSE). It used to work smooth and nice. No Linux distros had it. I am curious. What happened? Now other distros like Slackware (not complaining about the distro) are mentioned and it does not say RPM based but Fedora based. Regards, R.Chung -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 21/02/14 17:44, Ricardo Chung wrote:
On Friday, February 21, 2014 06:38:31 AM C wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
SpiderOak no longer maintains openSUSE packages. Just dissappeared from repo in last hour. Last rpm was
SpiderOak-9948-1.x86_64 Thu 11 Oct 2012 01:46:20 PM EDT
This isn't really new is it? I thought SpiderOak stopped building openSUSE RPMs back in 2012. I remember this from Google+: https://plus.google.com/118182144522076820414/posts/huwnFyu31zP
Plus... the "last RPM" you listed is dated 11 Oct 2012? There have been several releases since Oct 2012, including a branding fix for SpiderOak on openSUSE in June of 2013. The repo version you were using (or at least referencing) looks to be a REALLY old release anyway.
C.
I still remember SpiderOak started on openSUSE 11.3 with a lot of whistle and bells. IIRC, That was a launching startup marketing on Linux (openSUSE). It used to work smooth and nice. No Linux distros had it.
I am curious. What happened? Now other distros like Slackware (not complaining about the distro) are mentioned and it does not say RPM based but Fedora based.
Regards,
R.Chung
I remember that as of the following version, 11.4, it got withdrawn from the non-OSS repo but there was no good explanation provided that I noticed as to why. It could have been a technical licensing incompatibility, or maybe just SpiderOak were disappointed with openSUSE user numbers, I don't know. Later I also noticed how all mention of openSUSE disappeared from their site and download page. There was nothing to clearly indicate whether the 'Fedora-based' RPM was openSUSE-compatible. I recall commenting about this at the time but whether it was to them direct I'm not sure. It's almost lost them my custom though because they don't seem very supportive of openSUSE any more and you therefore have to wonder if the RPM package will remain compatible. As it is I could easily do without the service anyway and use other solutions, as I only have the free 2GB for occasional convenience of copying across other machines or for extra off-site backups. Peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
I emailed them yesterday, and they replied that tre Red Hat rpm works perfectly with all current and recent OS versions, but they didn't offer any explanation as to why they don't mention that on their website.
Probably got pissed at some bad mouthing, real or imagined from opensuse staff somewhere along the way.
On 21 February, 2014 1:08:49 PM PST, Peter
On 21/02/14 17:44, Ricardo Chung wrote:
On Friday, February 21, 2014 06:38:31 AM C wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
SpiderOak no longer maintains openSUSE packages. Just dissappeared from repo in last hour. Last rpm was
SpiderOak-9948-1.x86_64 Thu 11 Oct 2012 01:46:20 PM EDT
This isn't really new is it? I thought SpiderOak stopped building openSUSE RPMs back in 2012. I remember this from Google+: https://plus.google.com/118182144522076820414/posts/huwnFyu31zP
Plus... the "last RPM" you listed is dated 11 Oct 2012? There have been several releases since Oct 2012, including a branding fix for SpiderOak on openSUSE in June of 2013. The repo version you were using (or at least referencing) looks to be a REALLY old release anyway.
C.
I still remember SpiderOak started on openSUSE 11.3 with a lot of whistle and bells. IIRC, That was a launching startup marketing on Linux (openSUSE). It used to work smooth and nice. No Linux distros had it.
I am curious. What happened? Now other distros like Slackware (not complaining about the distro) are mentioned and it does not say RPM based but Fedora based.
Regards,
R.Chung
I remember that as of the following version, 11.4, it got withdrawn from the non-OSS repo but there was no good explanation provided that I noticed as to why. It could have been a technical licensing incompatibility, or maybe just SpiderOak were disappointed with openSUSE user numbers, I don't know.
Later I also noticed how all mention of openSUSE disappeared from their
site and download page. There was nothing to clearly indicate whether the 'Fedora-based' RPM was openSUSE-compatible. I recall commenting about this at the time but whether it was to them direct I'm not sure. It's almost lost them my custom though because they don't seem very supportive of openSUSE any more and you therefore have to wonder if the
RPM package will remain compatible. As it is I could easily do without the service anyway and use other solutions, as I only have the free 2GB
for occasional convenience of copying across other machines or for extra off-site backups.
Peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
-- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
participants (7)
-
C -
Greg Freemyer -
John Andersen -
Marco Calistri -
Patrick Shanahan -
Peter -
Ricardo Chung