RE: [SLE] News: SuSE Linux 7.1 pending release February 12
The release notice I saw mentioned glibc2.2 Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Cleary UNIX Qualification and Commands Data General, a Division of EMC2 62 T.W. Alexander Dr. Research Triangle Park, NC mdcleary@dg-rtp.dg.com (919) 248-6033 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Mark Hounschell [mailto:markh@compro.net] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 4:03 PM Cc: SuSE ML Subject: Re: [SLE] News: SuSE Linux 7.1 pending release February 12 Álvaro A. Novo wrote:
(Quoting)
SuSE Linux 7.1 Ships With Kernel 2.4 On February 12
Does anyone know if it will be with glibc2.2.1 instead of 2.0?? -- Mark Hounschell markh@compro.net -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
* Cleary, Mike (Cleary_Mike@emc.com) [010125 14:42]:
The release notice I saw mentioned glibc2.2 Does anyone know if it will be with glibc2.2.1 instead of 2.0??
glibc-2.2-5. -- Cheers, Christopher Mahmood --------------------------------------------------------------- SuSE Inc., Tel: +1-510-628-3380, x5024 580 Second St., Suite 210 Fax: +1-510-628-3381 Oakland CA 94607 Public Key: USA http://www.suse.com/~ckm/key.gpg ---------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Mahmood wrote:
* Cleary, Mike (Cleary_Mike@emc.com) [010125 14:42]:
The release notice I saw mentioned glibc2.2 Does anyone know if it will be with glibc2.2.1 instead of 2.0??
glibc-2.2-5.
That's funny, just got got latest from gnu.org a couple days ago and it was 2.2.1. release jan 13 2001. -- Mark Hounschell markh@compro.net
Yes, but the distribution wasn't built and tested with in the last few days. The developers have been putting this puppy together for quite sometime. I am sure that if there is a security risk with a version they have backported the fixes or that there will be fixes out before the version is released so everyone can do any immediate patching of the system. * Mark Hounschell (markh@compro.net) [010126 13:45]: =>Christopher Mahmood wrote: =>> =>> * Cleary, Mike (Cleary_Mike@emc.com) [010125 14:42]: =>> > The release notice I saw mentioned glibc2.2 =>> > Does anyone know if it will be with glibc2.2.1 instead of 2.0?? =>> =>> glibc-2.2-5. => =>That's funny, just got got latest from gnu.org a couple days ago =>and it was 2.2.1. release jan 13 2001. => -- Ben Rosenberg mailto:brosenb@suse.com --------------------------------------- SuSE Inc. 580 Second St Suite 210 Oakland CA 94607 U.S.A Tel: 1-510-628-3380 EXT:5086 Fax: 1-510-628-3381 --------------------------------------- "There are no problems, only solutions."
Well, I saw already some fixes and patches for 7.1 on the ftp server !!! Filip. Le Vendredi 26 Janvier 2001 22:49, vous avez �crit :
Yes, but the distribution wasn't built and tested with in the last few days. The developers have been putting this puppy together for quite sometime. I am sure that if there is a security risk with a version they have backported the fixes or that there will be fixes out before the version is released so everyone can do any immediate patching of the system.
* Mark Hounschell (markh@compro.net) [010126 13:45]: =>Christopher Mahmood wrote: =>> =>> * Cleary, Mike (Cleary_Mike@emc.com) [010125 14:42]: =>> > The release notice I saw mentioned glibc2.2 =>> > Does anyone know if it will be with glibc2.2.1 instead of 2.0?? =>> =>> glibc-2.2-5. => =>That's funny, just got got latest from gnu.org a couple days ago =>and it was 2.2.1. release jan 13 2001. => -- Ben Rosenberg mailto:brosenb@suse.com --------------------------------------- SuSE Inc. 580 Second St Suite 210 Oakland CA 94607 U.S.A Tel: 1-510-628-3380 EXT:5086 Fax: 1-510-628-3381 --------------------------------------- "There are no problems, only solutions."
Well, I would assume since it was going to press and things are found after this..that they put the files up for immediate upgrade/update. * filip (vhf@skynet.be) [010126 14:13]: =>Well, I saw already some fixes and patches for 7.1 on the ftp server !!! =>Filip. => -- Ben Rosenberg mailto:brosenb@suse.com --------------------------------------- SuSE Inc. 580 Second St Suite 210 Oakland CA 94607 U.S.A Tel: 1-510-628-3380 EXT:5086 Fax: 1-510-628-3381 --------------------------------------- "There are no problems, only solutions."
I upgraded this past week to the last stuff via ftp . xwin was running fine then 6.4. it runs fine as root but gives me this error fatal error xd860penaConsole: server must be running with root mperissions. not had this to happen before. I will try an run xf86Setup when i return to town tomorrow an see if that fixes the problem. jack Jack Malone jack@malone.tyler.com http://www.ballistic.com/~jemalone Luke 4:18-19 "The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to release the oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord's favor." (NIV)
* Mark Hounschell (markh@compro.net) [010126 13:44]:
Christopher Mahmood wrote:
* Cleary, Mike (Cleary_Mike@emc.com) [010125 14:42]:
The release notice I saw mentioned glibc2.2 Does anyone know if it will be with glibc2.2.1 instead of 2.0??
glibc-2.2-5.
That's funny, just got got latest from gnu.org a couple days ago and it was 2.2.1. release jan 13 2001.
Thorstan Kukuk would know why 2.2 was used. -- Cheers, Christopher Mahmood --------------------------------------------------------------- SuSE Inc., Tel: +1-510-628-3380, x5024 580 Second St., Suite 210 Fax: +1-510-628-3381 Oakland CA 94607 Public Key: USA http://www.suse.com/~ckm/key.gpg ---------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Jan 26, Mark Hounschell wrote:
Christopher Mahmood wrote:
* Cleary, Mike (Cleary_Mike@emc.com) [010125 14:42]:
The release notice I saw mentioned glibc2.2 Does anyone know if it will be with glibc2.2.1 instead of 2.0??
glibc-2.2-5.
That's funny, just got got latest from gnu.org a couple days ago and it was 2.2.1. release jan 13 2001.
Michael Hasenstein explained it already very good yesterday on this list. The glibc is a core component, much more important then the kernel (It is esay to boot another kernel, but you cannot boot another libc). All of our architectures bases on the same source code, so we will not change the glibc for PPC after Intel is released. And in the short time it is not possible to make all the tests we did already the last month. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de SuSE GmbH Schanzaeckerstr. 10 90443 Nuernberg Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse, cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
participants (7)
-
Ben Rosenberg -
Christopher Mahmood -
Cleary, Mike -
filip -
Jack Malone -
Mark Hounschell -
Thorsten Kukuk