Fwd: Re: [SLE] [OT] Legal Issues Type Question
Wow!! I didn't know that my comment would fuel up so much energy. Well,
here's some more info. Below is what I found out by querying my contact at
Simply Computers.
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: [SLE] [OT] Legal Issues Type Question
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 08:02:35 +0100
From: Eddie Howson
In message <0105021602130I.00665@gladys>, Eddie Howson
writes Thank you Bernard,
I have cc. this email message to my contact at Simply computers.
I've copied it to David Fleck at Simply.
Cheers.
-------------------------------------------------------
I think you'll find that Simply are not alone. This is a common OEM deal,
and it is only recently (last 12months-ish) that the big boys such as Dell
and Compaq have managed to break away from this restrictive policy. Can
your friend at Simply find out what the Draconian penalty would be if Simply
sold a machine without an MS OS ?
This whole thread has merely increased my curiosity for these matters.
Also, someone mentioned in a previous post that corporations exist to make
money. I can't argue with that. However, attempting to acquire >99% of the
world's wealth through dodgy licencing deals seems somewhat underhanded.
And how many pirate copies of MS software would be out there if they only
cost $/£20 each ? If W2K cost so much less, the margins for the pirates
diminish, and MS could probably make the same amount of money by selling a
greater volume of units worldwide instead of relying on high margins which
penalise those countries where the populous *is* inclined to buy its
software legitimately (US/UK/DE etc).
There have also been complaints about the price of SuSE recently. $70 seems
to be getting a bit steep. But look at what you get. A top notch OS with
the functionality of *all* the MS OSes (home/game/business/server) and more
besides (firewall/router/security etc), and that can emulate Novell and Mac
servers too. You get 7 CDs and a DVD choc full of games, tools and business
apps, with a reliable source for updates and patches. You also get a major
array of manuals, which is more than can be said for the MS OSes. Their
installation guide is nothing more than a pamphlet these days. And here's
the kicker; that $70 media kit can be passed from one person to the next
until it is installed worldwide, and every PC on the planet can be in
compliance with the licencing (as long as GPL software is used) for that $70
fee. Of course, this would quickly put SuSE out of business, so many of us
go out and buy our own copies. And we keep going out and buying new
versions as they come out. Why ? Because we know it is a polished product.
We are aware that it will have bugs to be ironed out, and that they will
usually be ironed out very soon after they have been discovered. The MS
Iron Curtain hides its bugs and they drag their heels on getting updates
out. Linux vendors just seems more honest about their product. New
versions of a Linux distro are known to be evolutionary. MS always seems to
tout its latest OS as the panacea that the previous version was claimed to
be, but failed to deliver on.
Anyway, I have rambled on long enough. Thanks to everyone who posted
responses to my original topic, I have been both entertained and informed.
Bye for now,
Stuart.
-----Original Message-----
<snip>
Wow!! I didn't know that my comment would fuel up so much energy. Well,
here's some more info. Below is what I found out by querying my contact at
Simply Computers.
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: [SLE] [OT] Legal Issues Type Question
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 08:02:35 +0100
From: Eddie Howson
Hey Stuart. As you are relating to my post, I'd still like to say something more. I totaly agree on what you are saying. Neither do I like paying big money for any OS, except I paid those 70$ or so bucks to buy SL and am a happy and proud owner of it :], so I'm transferring most of my computer activities from Wins to Linux :-))). Until recently my only choice were Windows 98/2000. It still has many pros against any Linux dist, but so does Linux. But one of the major problems [besides some unsupported hardware] Linux is, has and will be experiencing are his "fanatic" users. It's great to see the way they cooperate; they share their knowledge everywhere they can and all the newbies [insluding me] and not-newbies anymore really appretiate that help. It's also true they have more computer knowledge in general than Windows users... and I could and should note billions of other pros. Ok, to get to cons. There are too many Linux users saying Linux is the only good OS ever existed, you can do anything with it blah blah blah yadda yadda da... Well that's where I must disagree. For a total newbie, it's still easier and more friendly to use Windows OS. Instalation is easier, using it is easier, playing games is "easier" [read: you cannot play all games under Linux a decent way]. I think Linux community should accept that Linux is not [yet] an dream-OS, but "Yet another OS" with it's pros and cons, and there is nothing wrong with that! Well, have I ever tried to explain that to any fanatic Linux user I have meet in my life [all of them were fanatics... Guys, WT* are you doing to today's children? :-)] I was interrupted and spited on. Hmm, I understand they love "their" OS, but you must always be open to any criticism. Saying Something is cool without allowing anyone to say anything against it is a type of one-sided sword. Kind Regards, Ziga Dolhar p.s.: shall I have offended anyone I make my best apologizes I can. In those two weeks I have Linux installed I've had much great time playing with it, but the above is still what I think. Anyway, Linux community, SuSE and all other Linux "resellers", Farewell! On Friday 04 May 2001 15:15, Stuart Powell wrote:
I think you'll find that Simply are not alone. This is a common OEM deal, and it is only recently (last 12months-ish) that the big boys such as Dell and Compaq have managed to break away from this restrictive policy. Can your friend at Simply find out what the Draconian penalty would be if Simply sold a machine without an MS OS ?
> Bye for now,
> Stuart.
>
I cutted it a little, hope you don't mind.
Hi Ziga! Ziga Dolhar wrote:
For a total newbie, it's still easier and more friendly to use Windows OS. Instalation is easier, using it is easier, playing games is "easier" [read: you cannot play all games under Linux a decent way].
I disagree with you here. Many friends of mine tried to install Windows. They failed. Sometimes windows forgets to install some dlls, and they were blocked. Windows did not have all the drivers on its CD, so they messed up with drivers a lot. As they saw my windows box with my nice partitions, they tried to have partitions too. What did they do? They formatted the HD... then made up partitions and then they wanted to install windows. The error message if you forget formatting is misleading: it says it has no space on the HD, no that you fool forget to format. These are only some examples. You could think my friends are idiots or something like that. I do not think so. Windows never let you see what's inside the PC, you can never learn. There is no docs, so you can hardly learn anything about it. Yes Windows is easier than linux if you know it better than linux. But I think everything should be easier when you know it better. I think for a complete computer beginner, installing Suse Linux is as hard as installing Windows. And Linux is easier to learn, too. Some years ago a friend of mine and I started to mess up with home LANS. Then I changed windows with linux. Nowadays I can say I know something about tcp/ip, udp, firewalling and routing, smb networking too. My friend sometimes cant undertand what he is doing when he plays around with his expensive commercial firewall. And he has not been able to set up connection sharing yet under Windows 2000. Windows hides everything, Linux does not. That's why now I am miles above him about networking. Ciao, Tazio ps: I am not a fanatic and I think Linux has a lot to improve.-)
I think Linux community should accept that Linux is not [yet] an dream-OS, but "Yet another OS" with it's pros and cons, and there is nothing wrong with that! Well, have I ever tried to explain that to any fanatic Linux user I have meet in my life [all of them were fanatics... Guys, WT* are you doing to today's children? :-)] I was interrupted and spited on. Hmm, I understand they love "their" OS, but you must always be open to any criticism. Saying Something is cool without allowing anyone to say anything against it is a type of one-sided sword.
Kind Regards, Ziga Dolhar
** Reply to message from Eddie Howson
participants (5)
-
Eddie Howson
-
jfweber@eternal.net
-
Stuart Powell
-
Tazio Ceri
-
Ziga Dolhar