RE: [SLE] Postfix: undisclosed recipients
That I would have thought. I did sendmail -v root < /tmp/dummy_file or sendmail -v myname@rl.ac.uk < /tmp/dummy_file The message got sent and arrives, but in the To: field, it says "undisclosed recipients". -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Shanahan [mailto:ptilopteri@gmail.com] Sent: 10 March 2005 15:43 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: Re: [SLE] Postfix: undisclosed recipients * Chiu, PCM (Peter)
The sendmail or postfix under Suse 9.2 has a strange default To: field with undisclosed recipients.
All outgoing mails bear this in the recipient field.
How to disable this?
That is the recipient addr when you leave the 'To:' field blank and 'Bcc:' instead. Put valid addr's in the 'To:' field and they should appear. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
On Thursday 10 March 2005 17:18, Chiu, PCM (Peter) wrote:
That I would have thought.
I did
sendmail -v root < /tmp/dummy_file
or
sendmail -v myname@rl.ac.uk < /tmp/dummy_file
The message got sent and arrives, but in the To: field, it says "undisclosed recipients".
What is in the file dummy_file? Try adding the line To: foo at the start of it The header To: is something that should be a part of your email data, it isn't something sendmail or postfix adds
Quoting Anders Johansson
On Thursday 10 March 2005 17:18, Chiu, PCM (Peter) wrote:
That I would have thought.
I did
sendmail -v root < /tmp/dummy_file
or
sendmail -v myname@rl.ac.uk < /tmp/dummy_file
The message got sent and arrives, but in the To: field, it says "undisclosed recipients".
What is in the file dummy_file?
Try adding the line
To: foo
at the start of it
The header To: is something that should be a part of your email data, it isn't something sendmail or postfix adds
Or use the mail command: mail root < /tmp/dummy_file It will add the To: header. Note: the recipient(s) listed for the sendmail command go in the message envelope, this is separate from the To: header. If there is not To: header, Postfix will add "To: undisclosed recipients". No To: header is useful for sending to a bunch of people at once without disclosing them all to each other. Kind of like Bcc: with no To:. HTH, Jeffrey
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 11:18, Chiu, PCM (Peter) wrote:
That I would have thought.
I did
sendmail -v root < /tmp/dummy_file
or
sendmail -v myname@rl.ac.uk < /tmp/dummy_file
The message got sent and arrives, but in the To: field, it says "undisclosed recipients".
Try: mail root < /tmp/dummy_file and see what happens. sendmail is the program that handles the message passed to it by the mail command. Also -please- do not top post and also please only reply to the list unless asked otherwise. Simply doing a "reply to all" results in the person trying to help you getting two copies of your message. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998 * Only reply to the list please* "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge
On Thursday 10 March 2005 12:02 pm, Ken Schneider wrote:
Also -please- do not top post
I'd suggest that when you make this request, you explain what top-posting is. Not all top-posters know. Also, some mailers (mainly Microsoft ones, I think) attach the original message without even displaying it in the composition window. You can defeat that behavior, but you have to know that it's necessary in order to do so. Paul
On Thursday 10 March 2005 12:25 pm, Paul W. Abrahams wrote:
I'd suggest that when you make this request, you explain what top-posting is. Not all top-posters know. Also, some mailers (mainly Microsoft ones, I think) attach the original message without even displaying it in the composition window. You can defeat that behavior, but you have to know that it's necessary in order to do so. Additionally, many lists like top-posting. There are some pros and cons. -- Jerry Feldman
Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
On Thursday 10 March 2005 12:46 pm, William Gallafent wrote:
http://www.stud.fernuni-hagen.de/q5043905/Suse-Linux-Etiquette-e.html
according to the text
9. Your own text should be below the (part of the) quote that it is an answer to. An English "Message Editing and Quoting Guide (with Examples)" can be found here:
"top posting" and "bottom posting" are discouraged. The link for editing and quoting doesn't exist. All in all, this one looks a lot more reasonable. B-)
Although many guidelines for posting are out there, it's clear that there's no agreement on the subject. Nevertheless, I'll propose two simple higher-level guidelines: 1. Exclude all quoted material that is of no value to the reader. The standard SuSE trailer lines are an egregious example of such extraneous material; nothing is gained by quoting them. 2. Organize the post logically, so that referenced material precedes the reference to it. As far as I'm concerned, someone who follows just those guidelines has done no wrong. Paul
participants (8)
-
Anders Johansson
-
Brad Bourn
-
Chiu, PCM (Peter)
-
Jeffrey L. Taylor
-
Jerry Feldman
-
Ken Schneider
-
Paul W. Abrahams
-
William Gallafent