
Is anyone currently using the ATI Radeon 8500? What is your opinion? Thanks a heap, Glen

On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 19:32, Glen Foy wrote:
Is anyone currently using the ATI Radeon 8500? What is your opinion?
I am. My Opinion: Don't buy one. In Windows (uh-oh - profanity :-) ) it crashes when playing DVD's full-screen. Ziff-Davis benchmarks suggest you'll do better (or at least as well) for less money with a GeForce 3 Titanium. In Linux: it's only 2D-supported under XFree86. I guess if you don't mind 'gears' at 300fps it's OK, but when people having a Geforce 2 can run nearly 4x faster... :-( I watch DVD's under Linux (Xine), but the frame-rates are only around 7.5fps, with sporadic chunks getting dropped. Much of this is teething problems. I fully expect this card to become well-supported in Linux after another couple of releases. Oh yeah - I originally bought a Radeon 64MB DDR with this new computer last Fall. This ATI card had a fan on the graphics-processor, and the bushing started to get noisey. I bring that up, because after only about 6 weeks, this Radeon 8500 is going the same way. When it gets too bad, I'll rip it off, drill a honkin' hole in the side of my case, and fit a chassis-fan and some ducting to replace the ATI fan... What do I like? 64MB of DDR memory. At 1280x1024 x 24 bits deep, I'm using about 1/2 the memory. For games, that leaves room for textures. For business, that gives me room to move to a 21" monitor / 1600x12800 later on. This card can do dual-head. One port is a standard D-Sub15 VGA connector, the other is a DVI connector for a flat-panel. ATI includes an adapter so that the DVI connector can be adapted to become a second VGA connector. There's also a TV-out jack, which echoes one of the other outputs (could be nice for watching a DVD on a large-screen TV). You can bet, though, that these features won't be supported under Linux for some time to come... :-( XFree86 5.0??? Again: spend your $$$ on a Geforce 3 Ti. -Gord -- Gordon Pritchard, P.Eng., Member IEEE Technical University of B.C. - Research Lab Engineer mailto:gordon.pritchard@techbc.ca direct phone: 604-586-6186

At 07:32 PM 1/31/2002 -0800, you wrote:
Is anyone currently using the ATI Radeon 8500? What is your opinion?
I didn't see it mentioned in the XFfree86 4.2 (or is it 4.1.2...whatever the last new one is) list of supported cards. I don't think it' supported yet.
Thanks a heap, Glen
---------------------------------------------------- Jonathan Wilson System Administrator Cedar Creek Software http://www.cedarcreeksoftware.com Central Texas IT http://www.centraltexasit.com

On Saturday 02 February 2002 01:45, JW wrote:
At 07:32 PM 1/31/2002 -0800, you wrote:
Is anyone currently using the ATI Radeon 8500? What is your opinion?
I didn't see it mentioned in the XFfree86 4.2 (or is it 4.1.2...whatever the last new one is) list of supported cards. I don't think it' supported yet.
Radeon 8500 is mention is XFree86 4.2 Readme. It said 2D support for Radeon7500 it said 3D support.

Hi! I hope you don't mind my 1/2-penny well-intentioned remark: The current issue of _Smart Computing_ tested it and says: "The Radeon 8500 is compatible with Win98/Me/2000/XP operating systems." [No word about Linux, which they do for the Matrox Millenium G550.] Then, "If you want 3-D eye candy, the Radeon 8500 will deliver a bagful of it. However, if games aren't your thing, you should pass in favor of a less expensive card [$299], because the Radeon 8500 doesn't run 2-D applications any faster than video cards that cost half as much." You may read the whole article at www.smartcomputing.com/mar02/. Regards, gr (in sunny, warm Florida) **"In war, it counts not who's right, but who's left."** /Dear Abby/

On Sunday 03 February 2002 09:30, gilson redrick wrote:
Hi! I hope you don't mind my 1/2-penny well-intentioned remark:
:)
The current issue of _Smart Computing_ tested it and says: "The Radeon 8500 is compatible with Win98/Me/2000/XP operating systems." [No word about Linux, which they do for the Matrox Millenium G550.]
;(
Then, "If you want 3-D eye candy, the Radeon 8500 will deliver a bagful of it. However, if games aren't your thing, you should pass in favor of a less expensive card [$299], because the Radeon 8500 doesn't run 2-D applications any faster than video cards that cost half as much."
right. But from XFree 4.2.0, they mention about Radeon 7500. It cost less than Matrox Millenium G550 (& GF2MX-DualHead). It has dual head. But I don't know the performance. (In Windows Radeon 7500 beat Matrox Millenium G550 & beat GF2MX)... But that's in Windows. Anyone had benchmark for Radeon 7500 vs. Matrox G550 in Linux?
You may read the whole article at www.smartcomputing.com/mar02/.
thanks for the link.
participants (5)
-
gilson redrick
-
Glen Foy
-
Gordon Pritchard
-
Isen Kusima
-
JW