Not sure what the proper name for them is, but a few releases back, SuSE packaged a small (1 inch square) raised sticker... suitable for covering the "designed for Windows" sticker, or perfect for adorning that little space on the front of your computer case. What I would like to know, is if these are available for sale somewhere, or if this was a one time thing? (I would also be interested in more of the pins, either the Tux or the SuSE versions, that were distributed at one point also.) - Herman
I liked then and found it to be a great marketing tool. That's probably why the stopped sending them :-) On (14/07/02 09:48), Herman Knief wrote:
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 09:48:03 -0700 From: Herman Knief
To: SuSE List Subject: [SLE] SuSE Logo stickers.. Not sure what the proper name for them is, but a few releases back, SuSE packaged a small (1 inch square) raised sticker... suitable for covering the "designed for Windows" sticker, or perfect for adorning that little space on the front of your computer case.
What I would like to know, is if these are available for sale somewhere, or if this was a one time thing? (I would also be interested in more of the pins, either the Tux or the SuSE versions, that were distributed at one point also.)
- Herman
On Sunday 14 July 2002 18:58, W. D. McKinney wrote:
Not sure what the proper name for them is, but a few releases back, SuSE packaged a small (1 inch square) raised sticker... suitable for covering the "designed for Windows" sticker, or perfect for adorning that little space on the front of your computer case.
I would like more too. Good for getting linux conversayions going on airplanes or at presentations whe people just SEE it and ask... Nick
does 8.0 come with any neat little things like that? I, too, liked those things. The one that fit so nicely over the "designed for windows" sticker (7.2?) and the pin (7.0) were my favorites. : -----Original Message----- : From: Nick Selby [mailto:php@nickselby.com] : Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 12:08 PM : To: suse-linux-e@suse.com : Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Logo stickers.. : : : On Sunday 14 July 2002 18:58, W. D. McKinney wrote: : : > > : > > Not sure what the proper name for them is, but a few releases : back, SuSE : > > packaged a small (1 inch square) raised sticker... suitable : for covering : > > the "designed for Windows" sticker, or perfect for adorning : that little : > > space on the front of your computer case. : : I would like more too. Good for getting linux conversayions going : on airplanes : or at presentations whe people just SEE it and ask... : : Nick : : -- : To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com : For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com : : Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com : :
heh, I thought I was the only one who tore off the Designed For Windows ..... sticker and replaced it with the Powered by Suse sticker. Thankfully I had some from the 7.3 box set. Believe it not when I got the 8.0 box it was the first thing I noticed....no stickers. On Sunday 14 July 2002 13:28, Jeric wrote:
does 8.0 come with any neat little things like that? I, too, liked those things. The one that fit so nicely over the "designed for windows" sticker (7.2?) and the pin (7.0) were my favorites.
On Sunday 14 July 2002 05:07 pm, Nick Selby wrote:
sticker
~ maybe, one can capture the Geko by downloading/saving the .gif/ .jpg or whatever, and then prnting home-made stickers { pretty sure SuSE logo .xpm's [or whatever they are called], must already be ones system, in abundance? } -- best wishes ____________ sent on Linux ____________
This is true... I was asking if they already has these items for sale. If not, then (aimed at someone at SuSE) who would I need to talk to about licensing (or whatever) to print or sell merchandise with the SuSE logo? Wouldn't want to step on anyone's toes (so to speak.) - Herman tabanna wrote:
On Sunday 14 July 2002 05:07 pm, Nick Selby wrote:
sticker
~ maybe, one can capture the Geko by downloading/saving the .gif/ .jpg or whatever, and then prnting home-made stickers { pretty sure SuSE logo .xpm's [or whatever they are called], must already be ones system, in abundance? }
On Monday 15 July 2002 01:43, tabanna wrote:
On Sunday 14 July 2002 05:07 pm, Nick Selby wrote:
sticker
~ maybe, one can capture the Geko by downloading/saving the .gif/ .jpg or whatever, and then prnting home-made stickers { pretty sure SuSE logo .xpm's [or whatever they are called], must already be ones system, in abundance? }
maybe SuSE can include a keyboard key-cap. so, we can put the key-cap on the windows button and change to tux and cammelion button.
On Monday 15 July 2002 04:54, Mojojojo wrote:
On Monday 15 July 2002 01:43, tabanna wrote:
On Sunday 14 July 2002 05:07 pm, Nick Selby wrote:
sticker
~ maybe, one can capture the Geko by downloading/saving the .gif/ .jpg or whatever, and then prnting home-made stickers { pretty sure SuSE logo .xpm's [or whatever they are called], must already be ones system, in abundance? }
maybe SuSE can include a keyboard key-cap. so, we can put the key-cap on the windows button and change to tux and cammelion button.
What a great idea Mojo! I too miss the included stickers in the box. My first was 7.2 and the included stickers were great! When I got the 8.0 box, that was one of the first things I went looking for, to see what new stuff SuSE had included for us. Nothing there or as the crocodile hunter would say, "crikey mate"! :o) Anyway, it seems that if this practice has become too expensive for SuSE to include in the boxed sets, that they might make them available from their store! Just a thought SuSE and the keyboard stickers are a wonderful idea too! Patrick -- ----------end of line........ --- KMail v1.4.2 --- SuSE Linux Pro v8.0 --- Registered Linux User #225206
--- Mojojojo
On Sunday 14 July 2002 05:07 pm, Nick Selby wrote:
sticker
~ maybe, one can capture the Geko by downloading/saving the .gif/ .jpg or whatever, and then prnting home-made stickers {
On Monday 15 July 2002 01:43, tabanna wrote: pretty sure SuSE logo
.xpm's [or whatever they are called], must already be ones system, in abundance? }
maybe SuSE can include a keyboard key-cap. so, we can put the key-cap on the windows button and change to tux and cammelion button.
I seem to recall finding a site that sold a key cap to replace the windows key with a "tux" key. Not sure about a cameleon button, though. ;-) Regards, Charles __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com
. . . a few releases back, SuSE packaged a small (1 inch square) raised sticker. . . I have one of those. Interested parties may contact me off list. I also have a couple of sheets with flat stickers (decals?)
-- Regards, gr, in /usually/ sunny, balmy Florida's Suncoast.
Hi all! I'm trying to compile a program and I got make [1]: . . . make [2]: . . . I've read 'man make' from beginning to end and can't find a clue to those backeted numbers (worse yet, another compile gave make [1], make [2], make [3], followed by a couple of make [2] and make [1]). Question 1: What's the meaning of those bracketed numbers? Both those tries at compiling programs resulted in *** Error 1 . . . *** Error 2 . . . 'man make' says the three asterisks mean "fatal error." Nowhere I'm able to find *what* Error 1 and Error 2 are. Question 2: Where do I find the meaning of those errors and, more importantly, how/what do I do to fix them? TALIA. -- Regards, gr, in /usually/ sunny, balmy Florida's Suncoast.
This might be better posted to suse-programming-e... gilson redrick wrote:
Question 1: What's the meaning of those bracketed numbers?
If you are compiling a project with multiple makefiles, it indicates makefile depth I think: i.e., make[2] was invoked by make[1], which was invoked by make. It's not very important: I've been writing makefiles for years without having to know what the numbers mean.
Both those tries at compiling programs resulted in *** Error 1 . . . *** Error 2 . . . 'man make' says the three asterisks mean "fatal error." Nowhere I'm able to find *what* Error 1 and Error 2 are.
Check the output above *** Error. The errors are not usually produced by Make itself but by some other program, typically gcc. The *** Error line just indicates there was an error so that you don't ignore the potentially huge amount of output above it. Better still, compile within (x)emacs: it will help you trace the error.
Question 2: Where do I find the meaning of those errors and, more importantly, how/what do I do to fix them?
This could be tricky if there's a programming bug. More likely, you have missing header files (*.h) and need to install them. Read the output, check the README and INSTALL files (assuming it's a released project). Google search for the *.h file names, look for packages that ought to be installed, make sure the associated *-devel RPMs are installed... JDL -- Non enim propter gloriam, diuicias aut honores pugnamus set propter libertatem solummodo quam Nemo bonus nisi simul cum vita amittit.
While this probably should be relegated to the SuSE programming list, I think I can propose a simple answer. First, in the simple cases, makefiles consist of optional definitions, targets and commands. Definitions are pretty much shell type of definitions, such as: CC=/usr/bin/gcc Targets and commands are: hello: hello.c \t$(CC) hello.c -o hello Each target may have zero or more dependencies. Note that a command line MUST begin with a tab character, NOT a space. Makefiles generally are much more complex, but I suspect that you have either one of your definitions incorrect or you are missing your target. On 15 Jul 2002 at 21:19, gilson redrick wrote:
I'm trying to compile a program and I got make [1]: . . . make [2]: . . . I've read 'man make' from beginning to end and can't find a clue to those backeted numbers (worse yet, another compile gave make [1], make [2], make [3], followed by a couple of make [2] and make [1]).
Question 1: What's the meaning of those bracketed numbers?
Both those tries at compiling programs resulted in *** Error 1 . . . *** Error 2 . . . 'man make' says the three asterisks mean "fatal error." Nowhere I'm able to find *what* Error 1 and Error 2 are.
Question 2: Where do I find the meaning of those errors and, more importantly, how/what do I do to fix them?
-- Jerry Feldman Enterprise Systems Group Hewlett-Packard Company 200 Forest Street MRO1-3/F1 Marlboro, Ma. 01752 508-467-4315 http://www.testdrive.compaq.com/linux/
participants (12)
-
Charles Griffin
-
gilson redrick
-
Herman Knief
-
Jeric
-
Jerry Feldman
-
John Lamb
-
Mojojojo
-
Nick Selby
-
Patrick
-
Scott
-
tabanna
-
W. D. McKinney