I liked then and found it to be a great marketing tool. That's probably why the stopped sending them :-) On (14/07/02 09:48), Herman Knief wrote:

Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 09:48:03 -0700 From: Herman Knief To: SuSE List Subject: [SLE] SuSE Logo stickers..

Not sure what the proper name for them is, but a few releases back, SuSE packaged a small (1 inch square) raised sticker... suitable for covering the "designed for Windows" sticker, or perfect for adorning that little space on the front of your computer case.

What I would like to know, is if these are available for sale somewhere, or if this was a one time thing? (I would also be interested in more of the pins, either the Tux or the SuSE versions, that were distributed at one point also.)

- Herman

does 8.0 come with any neat little things like that? I, too, liked those things. The one that fit so nicely over the "designed for windows" sticker (7.2?) and the pin (7.0) were my favorites. : -----Original Message----- : From: Nick Selby [mailto:php@nickselby.com] : Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 12:08 PM : To: suse-linux-e@suse.com : Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Logo stickers.. : : : On Sunday 14 July 2002 18:58, W. D. McKinney wrote: : : > > : > > Not sure what the proper name for them is, but a few releases : back, SuSE : > > packaged a small (1 inch square) raised sticker... suitable : for covering : > > the "designed for Windows" sticker, or perfect for adorning : that little : > > space on the front of your computer case. : : I would like more too. Good for getting linux conversayions going : on airplanes : or at presentations whe people just SEE it and ask... : : Nick : : -- : To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com : For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com : : Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com : :

On Sunday 14 July 2002 05:07 pm, Nick Selby wrote:

sticker

~ maybe, one can capture the Geko by downloading/saving the .gif/ .jpg or whatever, and then prnting home-made stickers { pretty sure SuSE logo .xpm's [or whatever they are called], must already be ones system, in abundance? } -- best wishes ____________ sent on Linux ____________

On Monday 15 July 2002 01:43, tabanna wrote:

On Sunday 14 July 2002 05:07 pm, Nick Selby wrote:

...

sticker

~ maybe, one can capture the Geko by downloading/saving the .gif/ .jpg or whatever, and then prnting home-made stickers { pretty sure SuSE logo .xpm's [or whatever they are called], must already be ones system, in abundance? }

maybe SuSE can include a keyboard key-cap. so, we can put the key-cap on the windows button and change to tux and cammelion button.

--- Mojojojo wrote:

...

On Sunday 14 July 2002 05:07 pm, Nick Selby wrote:

...

sticker

~ maybe, one can capture the Geko by downloading/saving the .gif/ .jpg or whatever, and then prnting home-made stickers {

On Monday 15 July 2002 01:43, tabanna wrote: pretty sure SuSE logo

...

.xpm's [or whatever they are called], must already be ones system, in abundance? }

maybe SuSE can include a keyboard key-cap. so, we can put the key-cap on the windows button and change to tux and cammelion button.

I seem to recall finding a site that sold a key cap to replace the windows key with a "tux" key. Not sure about a cameleon button, though. ;-) Regards, Charles __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com

Hi all! I'm trying to compile a program and I got make [1]: . . . make [2]: . . . I've read 'man make' from beginning to end and can't find a clue to those backeted numbers (worse yet, another compile gave make [1], make [2], make [3], followed by a couple of make [2] and make [1]). Question 1: What's the meaning of those bracketed numbers? Both those tries at compiling programs resulted in *** Error 1 . . . *** Error 2 . . . 'man make' says the three asterisks mean "fatal error." Nowhere I'm able to find *what* Error 1 and Error 2 are. Question 2: Where do I find the meaning of those errors and, more importantly, how/what do I do to fix them? TALIA. -- Regards, gr, in /usually/ sunny, balmy Florida's Suncoast.

While this probably should be relegated to the SuSE programming list, I think I can propose a simple answer. First, in the simple cases, makefiles consist of optional definitions, targets and commands. Definitions are pretty much shell type of definitions, such as: CC=/usr/bin/gcc Targets and commands are: hello: hello.c \t$(CC) hello.c -o hello Each target may have zero or more dependencies. Note that a command line MUST begin with a tab character, NOT a space. Makefiles generally are much more complex, but I suspect that you have either one of your definitions incorrect or you are missing your target. On 15 Jul 2002 at 21:19, gilson redrick wrote:

I'm trying to compile a program and I got make [1]: . . . make [2]: . . . I've read 'man make' from beginning to end and can't find a clue to those backeted numbers (worse yet, another compile gave make [1], make [2], make [3], followed by a couple of make [2] and make [1]).

Question 1: What's the meaning of those bracketed numbers?

Both those tries at compiling programs resulted in *** Error 1 . . . *** Error 2 . . . 'man make' says the three asterisks mean "fatal error." Nowhere I'm able to find *what* Error 1 and Error 2 are.

Question 2: Where do I find the meaning of those errors and, more importantly, how/what do I do to fix them?

-- Jerry Feldman Enterprise Systems Group Hewlett-Packard Company 200 Forest Street MRO1-3/F1 Marlboro, Ma. 01752 508-467-4315 http://www.testdrive.compaq.com/linux/