On 09/21/2016 04:36 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-09-21 05:19, sdm wrote:
On 09/20/2016 07:46 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 09/20/2016 07:15 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote: I got the direct copy 20 minutes before than the mail list copy of this email. Thus I replied in private first. The problem is local to your system: :-?
I accidentally replied to you directly instead of the list...then I replied to the list after realizing. Sorry :)
direct copy:
Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 01D9E1032D1; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 04:59:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 19:59:33 -0700
mail list copy:
Received: by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 20002) id 9B30F202C30; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 05:19:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:19:44 -0700
I don't see a reason for an VPN to replace headers in mail. Unless for anonymizing :-? Because it's over UDP and there can be packet loss, it was just a guess.. Yes, a changed byte on the references or msgid header can do it. But even if the transport is udp, the "cargo" is tcp. That layer would ask for a repeat of the package. Just guessing.
I think what could be happening is I'm deleting messages from the list that I've read already, but I'm not always reading them in order. So they aren't always being deleted in the order they came in. Could that affect the thread breakage? sdm -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org