Michael W Cocke wrote:
ReiserFS
I'm sorry to say this may well lie at the root of your problem. No matter how much the reiserfs proponents may protest otherwise the fs is not fully compatible with nfs.
Oh My GOD! Is this an opinion or authoritative? No. I'm not trolling or joking. I decided (on the last rebuild, relatively recently) to try Reiser on my primary file server.
Mike-
I am hardly an authority, just a user with two bad experiences with ReiserFS. I had a problem on a desktop and it was near impossible to recover from it due to ReiserFS so when I reloaded Suse 9.1 I selected Ext3 instead -- same a couple of days ago on my notebook. If you read the description of the strengths and weaknesses of the different filesystems by Suse recovery is a weak spot for ReiserFS and a strength of Ext3 -- and for most users I see little advantage for selecting ReiserFS over Ext3. -- Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e West Central Florida 100% Linux. Suse 9.1 Drake, Hallicrafters, Heathkit, TenTec, Yaesu Radio Life: http://www.gospelcom.net/twr/ Linux-Incompatible hardware is defective! USA Pres. Election 2004: http://www.rnc.org/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~