From: Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 15:53:48 +0100 Message-Id: <00112915534802.02021@buffy> Subject: Re: [SLE] Balsa, mahogany, kmail...Summing up
Not at all out off-topic. In these points (and few others) we have all. Mutt it seems me powerful and compliant and I don't need anymore.
There is no doubt mutt is a very superior piece of software. For quick handling of email it is a joy. But I prefer to use a gui for writing new emails (as opposed to replying to them) and to organise my mail in general. So I use Kmail2, apart from it's bizarre behaviour under certain circumstances it seems to me to be pretty good. (I intend to post about this bizarreness when I can find out how to describe it in words!) So I use both, and it is a credit to the community of people who work on this stuff that I can use both without any problems whatsoever. Maybe the search for a single solution is doomed to failure ? As the author of mutt says (apologies if quote is inexact) "All mail programs suck; this one just sucks less" Cliff