Am 10.02.2016 um 08:25 schrieb Per Jessen:
Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
09.02.2016 22:08, Per Jessen пишет:
Per Jessen wrote:
[snip]
I removed digikam today, shouldn't kipi-plugins have been automatically removed too?
Am I doing this the wrong way:
office34:~ # rpm -q --whatrequires digikam no package requires digikam
I'm not going to really *install* it for testing, I can only believe zypper. And please do not forget that RPM --whatrequires is much more literal and must be exact.
Hi Andrei
I think this is the issue we're seeing -
the current kipi-plugins, at least on my test system, does _not_ require digikam. Presumably this is why I was able to remove digikam without kipi-plugins getting upset.
The _new_ kipi-plugins from the update requires digikam-libs, which in turn requires digikam, hence zypper needs to install it.
One might wonder why digikam-libs requires digikam, it's usually the other way round.
I am sure you are right. Just for testing I ran a "zypper rm digikam" as dryrun to see what it wants to do. It will not remove kipi-plugins, it says it will replace it by an older version. Also I am a bit surprised that digikam-libs requires digikam instead of the other way around (which I have missed before to see that strange dependency and misread it) so it is pulled in by an indirect dependency via kipi-plugins when it fetches the digikam-libs which the older one does not need. Strange dependencies here. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org