On 23/08/2020 16.56, ken wrote:
On 8/23/20 10:17 AM, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
On 2020-08-23 8:04 a.m., ken wrote:
Finally, I added one other measure: In Yast I changed the priorities of the repos, left packman at its current default of 99, but lowered the priority of the other repos. I hope this was correct and sensible. My thinking was that by giving packman a higher priority, future updates to my system will not undo the fix I just did. Good idea?
Repo priority is actually kind of backwards. 0 (zero) is the highest priority, and 200 is the lowest.
Thanks much.
I suppose if the goal was to be as counter-intuitive as possible, that's a definite development success. (Wow!)
In numbering system, the 1 goes before than the two, the 50 before the 100, etc. It is a perfectly logical choice for a programmer. It is the English language which gets it wrong :-P -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.1 x86_64 at Telcontar)