On 2023-01-24 09:30, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2023-01-23 20:51, David T-G wrote:
Paka, et al -- ...and then Patrick Shanahan said... % * Carlos E. R. <> [01-23-23 06:36]: % > % > Patrick is using Mutt, which is ancient software, and I am using ... % % please define "ancient software". yes, mutt is > 27 years of age but my % last update: Build Date : Mon 05 Dec 2022 12:06:19 PM EST % ie: it is constantly improving. [snip]
+1 ... or maybe +10 or +100 :-)
UNIX is ancient, too; I'd put elm and PINE there. Linux is by now fairly long in the tooth, and I'd put mutt in that range. So, yeah, maybe ancient ... but *good*.
I didn't say otherwise... only that it is ancient ;-)
But it's support of PGP may not be working or may not exist. Similar to Alpine's.
Yesterday you posted two messages from Alpine, both with PGP signatures. They worked fine, although I can't be bothered to check the signatures.
Exactly, your knode, same as my alpine, only work with inline signatures, but not with s/mime, attached signatures. Ancient software. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.4 x86_64 at Telcontar)