2010. január 24. 8:39 napon Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> írta:
On 2010/01/24 07:30 (GMT+0200) Dotan Cohen composed:
KDE 3 users: please tell me what KDE 4 is missing or doesn't work for you. Other than a few minor issues (no manual panel hide, no System Settings applet, no metadata in Konqueror) I think that KDE 4.4 has all the functionality of KDE 3, and it uses less resources too now!
[snip]
It's a nice gesture, but a big problem with KDE4 for KDE3 users is it's so vastly different many won't spend the time to figure out how to do what it can do,
[snip]
The Kicker replacement alone has already wasted too much of my time trying to make work and look like KDE3.
Hello: It is not only about if KDE4 can do the same or not as KDE3 (it can't). Even if it can do the same it does it very differently than KDE3. Why do KDE developers think that people who invested a lot of time to learn how to use KDE3 now will start this learning curve again? I am sure that my parents won't, they will keep using KDE3. Even if it isn't perfect there are no showstoppers in it for most of its users. KDE4 is full of showstoppers. And how could it happen that a distribution like SUSE/openSUSE which is/was (?) famous for its reliability, stability and user friendliness included that buggy, unstable KDE4 as default KDE, and expelled KDE3 to build service? Why the KDE developers claimed their less-than beta quality product stable back then, when KDE 4.2 came out? (Now they say that it will be stable, usable at version 4.2 in August.) Istvan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org