![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/c67187df40991a68ff679fff2c11235e.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
7 May
2001
7 May
'01
05:02
KDE2 is not SuSE. You would do well to remember that. Just because a bug exists in KDE doesn't mean it's a SuSE thing. A Window Manager/Desktop does not a distribution make or an OS. If this were true...OSX would rule
Ok, is there any particular reason that SuSE decided to go with KDE(2) as
their preferred WM/Desktop?
Also, can anyone tell me what SuSE (ala S.u.S.E.) originally stood for?
Strance questions at a strange time.
Geordon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Rosenberg"
planet. ;)
Regards, -- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org