On 14/07/17 01:29 PM, ianseeks wrote:
If referring to bugs fixed in systemd then i agree, jumping ship is not really clever.
Indeed. Expecting any software created by man, directly or indirectly, to be free of bugs and errors, is the height of stupidity. Having a regular and consistent architecture/design, as opposed to an ad-hoc one, makes the errors easier to find (both by hackers and developers) and to address. Those of us who are old enough will remember the maintenance problems 'spaghetti code' of the days before Edgar Dijkstra's "Go To Statement Considered Harmful" and the problems doing development before Codd's advocacy of SQL. Disciplined structure gives poser though focus. An alternative would be converting cities and countryside to a paved expanse where you could drive in any direction and any speed with no protocols preventing you ... 'interacting' with other vehicles. Hmm. Yes, it seems that there are cities like that in some places in the world. People do in fact choose to live there. I'd rather not. It's bad enough in North America. http://www.investors.com/politics/perspective/gun-vs-traffic-accident-deaths... http://www.nationalobserver.com/2016/01/18/news/guns-are-more-deadly-cars-21... -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org