* Scott Jones
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 5:03 am, Kevin Donnelly wrote:
On Monday 25 November 2002 12:07 pm, Scott Jones wrote:
I've tracked down the offending message (from Patrick Shanahan in the
Just for curiosity, and future reference, how did you do this?
Short answer? It was the one that was different. Really, it was the only message in that folder that wasn't marked as read. Do an 'ls' in your mail folder; read messages should have ":2,S" appended to the filename, where this one didn't. rm'ing it from the folder did the trick.
For the record, I got a response from Ingo:
------
------- Additional Comment #5 From Ingo Kl???cker 2002-11-26 16:27 ------- The problem seems to be caused by a message with these headers:
Message-ID: <20021123T205545.GAdc6e4.pat@wahoo.no-ip.org> References:
<97c85d994b.john@xl-cambridge.com> <20021123T205545.GAdc6e4.pat@wahoo.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: <20021123T205545.GAdc6e4.pat@wahoo.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i For some reason Message-ID == In-Reply-To. KMail probably doesn't handle this case (which should never happen) correctly.
The subject post(s) resulted from editing/resending a post. It should not have been a problem. I will do the same with this post for a check. This post is an edited original. Check the Message-ID. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org