On Sunday 16 October 2005 06:46 pm, Toshi Esumi wrote:
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 17:39 -0400, Bruce Marshall wrote:
You should start writing these questions down so you can provide the information without people having to ask.
Just what I need. Attitude. No problem. I'm going back to 9.3, which works, and let you smart guys figure this out. I wasted enough time trying to fix a broken distribution.
Hey.... I'm ready to give up too if you continue using 100.1 addresses.... :-)
Oh... I see you already gave up. Ok...
That's too sad ;( If you don't see "eth0" in ifconfig, there may be a compatibility issue between SuSE 10.0 and the PCMCIA NIC.
I have had issues with eth0/eth1 assignment in my desktop with 10.0. In my case a perfectly good eth config through yast ends up with a "nonexistent device" error when eth0 is looked up for energization, leaving only lo and vmnet1 in the ifconfig listing ( i run vmware) . I am convinced it's a bug, everything works great in the same machine when running under 9.3. Have filed it as bug #120332 in Bugzilla. For me it looks like 10.0 will stay in the "play" partition for a while yet... demitri
If you want to set up a static IP on one of your PCs(like the laptop) in the future, pick one of IPs within 192.168.1.52-192.168.1.254 because you said you assigned 50 IPs for DHCP at the Linksys (192.168.1.2-192.168.1.51). For example, -Linksys: 192.168.1.1/24 (DHCP server) -PC-1 : 192.168.1.2(via DHCP) -PC-2 : 192.168.1.3(via DHCP) -PC-3 : 192.168.1.4(via DHCP) -Laptop : 192.168.1.52(static)
This is the way to keep all devices happy campers.
Toshi