* Kai Ponte <kai@perfectreign.com> [12-26-08 17:28]:
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I do not understand your comment's relevance to this thread.
LOL!
I figured you wouldn't.
Your assumption that a x.3 version has significance beyond occupying a position in a progression of distributions is mislaid.
No, it's true. I'll bet you that 11.3 will be a fantastic version, just like 10.3 and 9.3 are/were.
Only coincidence and Clayton's answer is sufficient. If not, it's only your delusion.
Further more, what does *any* version of windoz have to contribute other than a good reason to use linux?
Just proving a point. Oh, and it was actually DOS versions. Dos 2, 4 and 6.0 all had issues.
But there is no *proof* here. I certainly realize that windoz *was* only a graphical shell on top of dos and that all dos versions had issues, but all linux versions have also had issues. There is no intelligent comparison to be made between windoz and linux versions. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org