Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:59:10 -0800, Linda Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> wrote:
Did you understand that chain of reasoning. Many these days have problems with basic logic.
Oh what a pleasent way to comunicate ...
Disproval of Reason 1: This is shown to only be true in *some cases* so it can't be used to support the statement that initrd is "needed"
And even if it is so, one case where it isn't needed doesn't invalidate the other ones.
I would like to see this -- the idea of moving things from /bin -> /usr/bin ... it was thought (though no one can give good reasons why) that this was a good idea.
The reasoning AFAIR was that many things needed for booting require binaries from /usr/bin (AFAIR udev was one such case) so why not get rid of /bin.
It's now proven not to be.
Yeah, I keep asking for evidence and reasons, and using logic,[D like above. People just hate that.
Seems like you really are blind on that eye and really can't see that that's not the problem.
The only blindness involved in what Linda is talking about is the utterly retarded and ill-conceived idea to move critical executables from /bin to /user/bin. And if the person who actually pushed that move through is also on Microsoft's payroll in some way or another -- it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
Philipp
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org