-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Monday 2007-05-14 at 02:15 +0200, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2007 15:54:13 -0800, John Andersen wrote:
It certainly wasn't done for technical reasons, seems like mostly a cost issue.
It's not true, unless you count maintainability as a cost issue. Plus there will be an update path from ext3 to ext4, something that reiserfs can't offer. And besides there being no path from reiserfs3 to reiserfs4, reiserfs4 with its metadata that can be changed by plugins is a maintenance nightmare.
I understand he thinks about going to xfs instead of ext3, not about leaving reiserfs. And I agree with the advisability of the decision to drop reiserfs as default fs, although I like that filesystem a lot, and I keep using it. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFGR6/atTMYHG2NR9URAij7AJwMf4C+f181wcVlfW2f2KG+oYFS3QCeLeHr imUzmkU8tJW3+y754Ug8E5Y= =QCSD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org