Them'r fighting words... heheh That has been debated so many times on this list, I hope you can get what your looking for. Presonally, I like nVidia. They seemed to have support faster for linux, and better for installs. I like the unified driver. Even as an aside from Linux, I have a very bad taste in my mouth for them for windows drivers. I can't tell you how many times I've looked for a driver for one of their cards but couldn't determine what the card was, even though I had it in my hands. No matching serial numbers, no matching model numbers for different drivers, etc... With nVidia, it just works. One driver for all cards regardless of who manufactured it. So, you get a cheap card with an nVidia chipset, and poorly implemented driver? No problem, pop onto nVidia's site and use theirs. I have insisted on all nVidia for all laptop / desktop for years have have not EVER regretted it. At gaming conferences, you can actually talk to them. ATI wouldn't even give me a minute. (Cost them $$$$ for our manufacturing line using PC hardware) TV-out seems relatively easy. VIVO has even worked in Linux. B-) On Wednesday 12 October 2005 9:21 am, Istvan Gabor wrote:
Dear SUSE users:
I want to buy a new graphics card and have difficulties which one to buy, ATI or NVIDIA based card. Currently I have Nvidia GeForce MX400 and I am satisfied with it. I think nvidia's linux driver is pretty good. Earlier I also had ATI Radeon 7000 but is not supported by proprietary ATI drivers. What I would ike to know how stable and reliable the proprietary ATI linux driver. Also would like to know which one is easier to configure for TV out and which has better TV out properties/quality - but this latter probably depends on the model too.
Any opinion and help is appreciated!
Thanks, IG
___________________________________________________________________________ _________________ Kisbabád lesz? Kisbabád született? Tele vagy kérdésekkel, és nem tudod, hol találsz választ? Kukkants be a Babázóba! - www.babazo.hu