On 20/09/17 01:18 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
b) What's the point? None of those participating in this thread is going to take up maintenance of reiserfs, so what exactly would be different?
That's a low blow by any scale. Belittling me because I am not C programmer, not someone who can understand the complexities of file system design. not a genius of the class of Mr Reiser himself is unworthy.
I now understand why the change is being made but I still don't understand exactly what is going to happen, despite asking.
I can only presume that the people who know aren't listening in.
What exactly is not clear in the blog entry? I wonder if anyone participating on this thread read blog entry beyond the first sentence if at all.
There's a lot that's not clear. Carlos is of the opinion that the ability to create or manipulate ReiserFS has been removed from YaST and that's all, that the /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.ko will still be present. I take it to mean, and what Mr Brown says reinforces my belief, is that such kernel modules, as well a the MKFS and other supporting code and script will be removed. And yes I read the whole blog entry. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org