On Tuesday 22 November 2005 19:20, Bruce Marshall wrote:
But you were implying/saying that gimp would do what you wanted (whetever that is) and that you wanted something more 'robust'. This implies you want something better than gimp.
I wasn't trying to _imply_ anything. I'll try to choose my words better next time. Okay?
So, to rephrase, just what won't gimp do that you want to do????
Well, as I said, I need to enlarge a digital image all the while decreasing the blur (noise) as much as possible, so I can see the logo in the digital picture. I'm going through the info related to ImageMagick's many tools as I type this. I'm getting better results with ImageMagick's tools then I was getting with Gimp. Now, that's not to say that Gimp can't do what I want. I did the best I could with Gimp but I still couldn't discern the logo. I was looking for something more specific to my needs (i.e. -convert). -- Christopher Shanahan