Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Kai Ponte <kai@perfectreign.com> [12-26-08 17:12]:
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
You do know that the version numbers have no real significance, 11.1 could just as well have been 9.9 and 11.3 would be 10.1. 11.3 does *not* indicate an 11.0 version that has been refined, adjusted, corrected, debugged, feature enhanced, feature crippled, or anything else other than a natural progression to achieve levels/limits set by the people who compile the distribution.
Yes, but did you ever use an even numbered version of windows??
'nuff said.
I do not understand your comment's relevance to this thread.
LOL! I figured you wouldn't.
Your assumption that a x.3 version has significance beyond occupying a position in a progression of distributions is mislaid.
No, it's true. I'll bet you that 11.3 will be a fantastic version, just like 10.3 and 9.3 are/were.
Further more, what does *any* version of windoz have to contribute other than a good reason to use linux?
Just proving a point. Oh, and it was actually DOS versions. Dos 2, 4 and 6.0 all had issues. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org