2 Sep
2006
2 Sep
'06
23:17
On Saturday 02 September 2006 6:49 pm, Robert Lewis wrote:
I stayed with 9.3 when 10.0 came out as my configuration is complex and usually takes me a couple of weeks to get everything back working.
When 10.1 came out I decided to go with that. In my view, apparently not others, it is far superior to 9,3 and I have been happy every since. So much so that I now have installed 10.1 on about 10 machines. Sure the rpm update system has been problematic but in every case I have won the battle with little effort and have been happy with the results.
But if I read you correctly, you have no data on 10.0 vs. 10.1, only 9.3 vs. 10.1. So your results are consistent both with 9.3 < 10.1 < 10.0 and with 9.3 < 10.0 < 10.1. Paul